BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//208.94.116.123//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7641@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T065028Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:CUNY CONTACT:http://bit.ly/cscitalks DESCRIPTION:
Hosted by Rebecca Keller and Ryan McElhaney
Some—but not all—sessions are recorded for later access
\n9/10: Carolyn Dicey Jennings Cognitive and Informati
on Sciences\, University of California\, Merced
9/17: Wayne Wu Philosophy\, Carnegie Mellon University
9/24: Chaz F
irestone Psychological and Bra
in Sciences\, The Johns Hopkins University
10/1: No talk—one-week break
10/8: Johann
es Kleiner Munich Center for Mathematical Philosophy\, Ludwig-Maximilians-
Universität München
10/15: Jessie Mu
nton Philosophy\, University o
f Cambridge
10/22: Myrto Mylopoulos Philosophy and Cognitive Science\, Carleton University
10/29: Pascal Burgmer <
/span> Social and Organisational Psych
ology\, University of Kent
11/5: Jennifer Nagel Philosophy\, University of Toro
nto
1
1/12: Elizabeth Irvine Philosophy\, Cardiff University
11/19: Anna Alexandrova
History and Philosophy of Science\, King’s College Cambridge 11/26: No tal
k—Thanksgiving
12/3: Hasok Chang History and Philosophy of Science\, University
of Cambridge
The CUNY Cognitive Science Speaker Series meets weekly at the CUNY Graduate
Center\, Fridays\, 1-3 pm—currently on Zoom. This file is at: http://bit.ly/cs-talks
For additional information e-
mail David Rosenthal
ALL TALKS ARE ON ZOOM\,
1-3\, NYC TIME
All are hosted by Rebecca Keller and Ryan McElhaney
Zoom links are all
announced on the Cognitive Science email list
To subscribe to that list\, email
davidrosenthal1@gmail.com
Some sessions—not all—are recorded for later access
2/11: Be
nce Nanay – Centre for Philosop
hical Psychology\, University of Antwerp
<
span dir='ltr' role='presentation'>2/18: No talk—one-week break
2/25: Joshua Mye
rs – Philosophy\, New York Univ
ersity
3/4: Nadine Dijkstra – Wellcom
e Centre for Human Neuroimaging\, University College London
3/11: Grace Helton
span> – Philosophy\, Princeton Univers
ity
3/
18: No talk—one-week break
3/25: Joshua Shepherd – Philosophy\, Carleton University and University of Barcelona
4/1:
Devin Sanchez Curry – Philosoph
y\, West Virginia University
4/8: Michał Wierzchoń – Institute of Psychology\, Jagiellonian University4/15: No talk—
Spring Break
4/22: Gary Ostertag – Ph
ilosophy\, CUNY Graduate Center
4/29: Jacob Berger – Philosophy\, Lycoming College
5/6: Maja Spener – Philosophy\, University of Birmingham5/13: Yair Lev
y – Philosophy\, Tel Aviv Unive
rsity
The CUNY Cognitiv
e Science Speaker Series meets weekly at the CUNY Graduate Center\,
Fridays\, 1-
3 pm\, NYC time—currently on Zoom. This file is at: http://bit.ly/cs-talks
For additional information e-mail Da
vid Rosenthal
THE COLUMBIA SOCI ETY FOR COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY
\nWelcomes you to an IN-PERSON meeting:
\n< p class='gmail-p2'>Allison Aitken (Columbia University)\n« A Case against Simple-mindedness: Śrīgupta on Mental Mereology »< /p>\n
With responses from Ale xander Englert (Princeton University)
\nABSTRACT: There’s a c ommon line of reasoning which supposes that the phenomenal unity of consci ous experience is grounded in a mind-like simple subject. To the contrary\ , Mādhyamika Buddhist philosophers beginning with Śrīgupta (seventh-eighth century) argue that any kind of mental simple is incoherent and thus meta physically impossible. Lacking any unifying principle\, the phenomenal uni ty of conscious experience is instead an ungrounded illusion. In this talk \, I will present an analysis of Śrīgupta’s “neither-one-nor-many argument ” against mental simples and show how his line of reasoning is driven by a set of implicit questions concerning the nature of and relation between c onsciousness and its intentional object. These questions not only set the agenda for centuries of intra-Buddhist debate on the topic\, but they are also questions to which any defender of unified consciousness or a simple subject of experience arguably owes responses.
\nDTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220513T173000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220513T193000 GEO:+40.807536;-73.962573 LOCATION:Faculty House\, Columbia U @ New York\, NY 10027\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:A Case against Simple-mindedness: Śrīgupta on Mental Mereology. All ison Aitken\, Columbia URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/a-case-against-simple-mi ndedness-srigupta-on-mental-mereology-allison-aitken-columbia/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Buddhism\,comparative\,mind END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7818@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T065028Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:CUNY CONTACT:http://bit.ly/cs-talks DESCRIPTION:
With responses from Mark Siderits (Illinois State University)
\nABSTRACT: Budd hist philosophers often draw a distinction between two different kinds of truth: conventional truth (saṃvṭi-satya) and ultimate truth (paramārtha-sa tya). Abhidharma Buddhists philosophers typically understand this distinct ion in terms of an ontological distinction between two different kinds of entities: ultimately real entities (paramārtha-sat) and conventionally rea l entities (saṃvṛti-sat). Similar to contemporary philosophical discussion s about ordinary objects\, Buddhist philosophers debate the ontological st atus of conventional entities and the semantics of discourse concerning th em. Mark Siderits (2015\, 2021\, 2022) has influentially argued for an eli minitivist position he calls “Buddhist reductionism” that interprets the A bhidharma position as one that denies conventional entities exist but that retains discourse involving apparent reference to them. However\, in a re cent article Kris McDaniel (2019)\, a prominent defender of ontological pl uralism\, challenges that view by proposing that the Abhidharma Buddhist d istinction between conventional truth and ultimate truth be “defined up” f rom a more basic distinction between two different ways an entity can exis t: conventionally or ultimately. In this paper I argue that Saṃghabhadra’s account of conventional reality and truth does lends itself well to McDan iel’s proposal but I will also argue that the account of conventional and ultimate truth that results differs in important ways from the models he o ffers. I will end by offering a modification of McDaniel’s account of conv entional truth that is derived from Saṃghabhadra’s pluralist ontology. Tha t view will\, unlike the views suggested by both Siderits and McDaniel\, a llow for there to be ultimate truths about what is conventionally true.
\n\n
Dinner will be kindly offered by the Columbia University Seminars.
\nRSVP is required for dinner. Please email Lucilla with eating requirements at lm3335@columb ia.edu.
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220930T173000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220930T193000 GEO:+40.806753;-73.959136 LOCATION:Faculty House\, Columbia U @ 64 Morningside Dr\, New York\, NY 100 27\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Buddhist Conventional Truth and Ontological Pluralism. Laura P. Gue rrero (William & Mary) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/buddhist-conventional-tr uth-and-ontological-pluralism-laura-p-guerrero-william-mary/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Buddhism\,metaphysics\,truth END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7872@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T065028Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U CONTACT:https://universityseminars.columbia.edu/seminars/comparative-philos ophy/ DESCRIPTION:With responses from Timothy Connolly (East Stroudsburg University)
\nABSTRACT: Recent philosophical discussions on compassion focus on the value and the
nature of compassion as an emotion. Ancient Asian philosophical tradition
s such as Confucianism and Buddhism\, however\, emphasize compassion as a
character trait that should be nurtured. This paper examines the insights
drawn from these traditions to help inform the nurturing of compassion. Fo
r example\, is empathy a necessary tool? What is the role of love and car
e? Does self-reflection contribute to the process?
\n
\n
Dinner will be kindly o ffered by the Columbia University Seminars.
\nRSVP is required for dinner. Please email Lucilla with eating requ irements at lm3335@columbia.edu.< span class='gmail-Apple-converted-space'>
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221014T173000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221014T193000 GEO:+40.806753;-73.959136 LOCATION:Faculty House\, Columbia U @ 64 Morningside Dr\, New York\, NY 100 27\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:How to nurture compassion? Some lessons from Asian philosophical tr aditions. Sin Yee Chan (U Vermont) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/how-to-nurture-compassio n-some-lessons-from-asian-philosophical-traditions-sin-yee-chan-u-vermont/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Buddhism\,Confucianism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7944@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T065028Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:CUNY CONTACT:http://bit.ly/cscitalks DESCRIPTION:Talks hosted by Ryan McE
lhaney
To get Zoom links\, email davidrosenthal1@gmail.com
Some—but not all—s
essions are recorded for later access
2/3: Justin Sytsma
Philosophy\, Victoria University of Wellington
2/10: Jonathan Birch
Philosophy\, London School of Economics
2/17: No tal
k—one-week break
2/24: Miguel Ángel Sebastián
Philosophy\, National Autonomous University of Mexico
p>\n
3/3:
Claudia Passos Ferreira
Philosophy\, New York University
** HYBRID: Graduate Center Ro
om 7102 **
3/10: Jonathan Morgan
Philosophy\, Montclair State University
** HYBRID:
Graduate Center Room 7102 **
Philosophy\, University of Gl
asgow
3/24: Robert Kentridge
Psychology and Centre for Vision and Visual Cogn
ition\, University of Durham
** HYBRID: Graduate Center Room 7102 **
3/31: J
osh Weisberg
Philosophy\, University of Houston
** HYBRID: Room TBA **
4/7\, 4/14:
Spring break—no talks
4/21: Michal Polák
Philosophy\, University of West Bohe
mia
The CUNY Cognitive Science Speaker Series meets weekly at the CUNY
Graduate Center\,
Fridays\, 1-3 pm—all on Zoom\, some hybrid. This file is at:
span> http://bit.ly/cs-talks
For additional
information e-mail David Rosenthal
The COVID-19 pandemic is said to be a once-in-a-century incident\, and it brought to us a sense of crisis at v arious levels. What is a crisis\, though? Can any unnerving moment or peri od be called a crisis\, or are there different dimensions of a crisis to w hich we need to be attentive? Is solidarity possible after experiencing a crisis like Covid-19? Can Buddhism make any contribution to facilitating s olidarity? This presentation explores the meaning and nature of a crisis a nd our responses to it by drawing on modern Korean political thinker Pak C h’iu’s (1909–1949) analysis of crisis and feminist-Buddhist thinker Kim Ir yŏp’s (1896–1971) Buddhist philosophy. By doing so\, this presentation con siders what social\, political\, existential\, and even religious meaning we can draw from our experience of crises\, and what questions these insig hts present to us.
\nWith responses from Karsten Struhl (John Jay College of Criminal Ju stice\, CUNY)
\nPresented by THE COLUMBIA SOCIETY FOR COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY
\nRSVP is required for dinne r. If you would like to participate in our dinner\, a $30 fee is requi red. Please contact Lucilla at lm3335@columbia.edu for further information.
\nDTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230303T173000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230303T193000 GEO:+40.806753;-73.959136 LOCATION:Faculty House\, Columbia U @ 64 Morningside Dr\, New York\, NY 100 27\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Philosophy of Crisis and a Question of Solidarity. Jin Y. Park (Ame rican) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/philosophy-of-crisis-and -a-question-of-solidarity-jin-y-park-american/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Buddhism\,comparative\,existentialism\,Korean\,politi cal\,religion\,social END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8022@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T065028Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:CUNY CONTACT:http://bit.ly/cs-talks DESCRIPTION:
ABSTRACT: Yogācāra Buddhists articulated in the 3-5th c. CE India an explicit model of how we collectively\, yet mostly unconsciously\, constru ct our shared social realities\, our cultures. These “worlds” are supporte d by cognitive processes informed by cultural influences occurring outside our conscious awareness\, in the “store-house consciousness” (ālaya-vijñā na). Through development and socialization\, we come to identify with thes e cultural norms\, thinking “I am this” and “this is mine.” Moreover\, and in agreement with cognitive scientists\, Yogācārins argue that humans hav e developed to be “innate essentialists\,” so that we imagine that our con structed social and cultural identities have their own essential\, intrins ic characteristics\, set apart from all others\, generating the “us/them” dichotomies that underlie conflicts between groups. We can counteract thes e harmful patterns\, Yogācārins say\, by analyzing how our social and cult ural “realities” are collectively constructed\, and by showing how—through logical\, psychological\, and contemplative exercises—we may weaken our u nreflective\, knee-jerk reaction to different peoples and cultures\, and t hereby foster more tolerance\, empathy and understanding for all beings. I n sum\, Yogācāra Buddhism offers a rigorous and nuanced analysis of the or igins of our prejudices and a set of methods to overcome them\, rooted in ancient traditions yet relevant to contemporary issues.
\nWith re sponses from Jonathan Gold (Princeton University)
\nDA TE: October 13th\, 2023
\nTIME: 5:30 pm EST
\nLO CATION: Philosophy Hall\, Room 716\, Columbia University
\n1150 Amsterdam Ave\, New York\, NY 10027
\nNOTE ON ENTRY FOR NON-COLUM BIA GUESTS: The door to Philosophy Hall will only open with a Columbia University ID card. If you do not have this card please arrive early wher e someone will be standing outside until the meeting begins. If you arrive late\, you can ask someone walking nearby to let you in or contact Cole a t cf27 98@columbia.edu. Please only contact Cole as a final resource so as no t to interrupt the talk.
\nThe first section of the talk will give an account of the Hi ndu-Buddhist debate about the existence of selves. The particular Hindu / Brāhmaṇical tradition concentrated on is Nyāya\, and ‘Buddhism’ is used t o refer specifically to Dharmakīrtian Buddhism with its doctrine of moment ariness. The second section looks at a Nyāya argument against Buddhism. I will argue that it is not difficult for the Buddhist to come up with a s atisfactory response. The third section will introduce the view of Rāmaka ṇṭha (950–1000 CE) and look at three of his arguments against the Buddhist view. These I view as more difficult for the Buddhist to respond to. Th e fourth section introduces the view of Galen Strawson\, relates it to the Buddhist view\, and considers the extent to which it is susceptible to Rā makaṇṭha’s arguments.
\nWith responses from Martin Lin (Ru tgers University)
\nNOTE ON ENTRY FOR NON-COLUMBIA GUESTS: b>The door to Philosophy Hall will only open with a Columbia University ID card. If you do not have this card please arrive early where someone will be standing outside until the meeting begins. If you arrive late\, you ca n ask someone walking nearby to let you in or contact Cole at cf2798@columbia.ed u. Please only contact Cole as a final resource so as not to interrupt the talk.
\nNOTE REGARDING DONATIONS: Due to COVID-19\, dona tions are only accepted through Columbia University’s secure online giving form\, Giving to Columbia.
\nRSVP is required for dinner. Di nner will take place at a nearby restaurant. Please contact Cole at cf2798@colum bia.edu for further information.
\nComparative Philosophy Semina r:
\nALL TALKS AVAILABLE ON ZOOM
\nSOME ALSO IN PERSON (Grad
uate Center room 7102)
\nTalks organized and hosted by Ryan McElhaney
\nTo get Zoom links: Email davidrosenthal1@gmail.com
2/2: Ed
ward Elliott
\nPhilosophy\, University of Leeds\; soon to be at Notre
Dame
\n*** HYBRID: Graduate Center Room 7102 ***
\n2/9: Sami R.
Yousif
\nPsychology\, University of Pennsylvania
\n*** HYBRID:
Graduate Center Room 7102 ***
\n2/16: Susan E. Carey
\nPsycholog
y\, Harvard University
\n*** HYBRID: Graduate Center Room 7102 ***
\n2/23: Amy Kind
\nPhilosophy\, Claremont McKenna College
\n3
/1: Johannes Fahrenfort
\nNeuroscience\, Conscious Brain Lab\, Vrije
Universiteit Amsterdam
\nand Universiteit van Amsterdam
\n3/8: S
am Coleman
\nPhilosophy\, University of Hertfordshire
\n3/15: Ch
ristopher Hill
\nPhilosophy\, Brown University
\n3/22: Nicholas
Humphrey
\nNeuropsychology\, London School of Economics and Darwin Co
llege Cambridge
\n3/29: No talk—Easter weekend
\n4/5: James R. O
’Shea
\nPhilosophy\, University College Dublin
\n4/12: Daniel St
oljar
\nPhilosophy\, Australian National University
\n4/19 and 4
/26: No talks—CUNY spring break
\n5/3: Willem A. deVries
\nPhilo
sophy\, University of New Hampshire
\n*** HYBRID: Graduate Center Roo
m 7102 ***
\n5/10: Kathleen Akins and Martin Hahn
\nPhilosophy\,
Simon Fraser University
\n*** HYBRID: Graduate Center Room 7102 ***<
/p>
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240202T130000
DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240202T150000
GEO:+40.748815;-73.984102
LOCATION:Hybrid: Zoom/ CUNY 7102 @ 365 5th Ave\, New York\, NY 10016\, USA
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240209T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240216T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240223T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240301T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240308T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240315T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240322T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240405T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240412T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240503T130000
RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240510T130000
SEQUENCE:0
SUMMARY:Cognitive Science Speaker Series
URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/cognitive-science-speake
r-series-21/
X-COST-TYPE:free
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:cognitive science\,mind
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
UID:ai1ec-8146@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress
DTSTAMP:20240329T065028Z
CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U
CONTACT:https://universityseminars.columbia.edu/seminars/comparative-philos
ophy/
DESCRIPTION:
How doe s the imagination change us? Why should picturing ourselves a certain way have any real effect on what we are? These questions are central to debate s in Buddhist tantric literature regarding the generation stage (utpatt ikrama)\, wherein practitioners visualize themselves as buddhas enscon sed in magnificent mandala-palaces. For some\, this practice is what sets Buddhist tantra apart: through this “yoga of the imagination\,” as David S hulman puts it\, a practitioner can achieve buddhahood in a single lifetim e. And yet\, as the Buddhist tantric author Indrabhūti (8th century) argue s\, a pauper who imagines himself to be a king does not thereby become one —so\, in the same way\, practitioners who visualize themselves as buddhas will not thereby become buddhas. The mental imagery (ākāra) involve d in this practice is just so much unreal fabrication. Why should it have real transformative effects? I’ll consider here how these debates played o ut in Sanskrit Buddhist tantric texts from the 10th–11th centuries. I’ll f ocus on early authors in the Kālacakra tradition\, who upheld Indrabhūti’s critique of the generation stage\, and authors like Ratnākaraśānti\, Vāgī śvarakīrti\, and Advayavajra (aka Maitrīpa)\, who each in their own way cr itiqued mental imagery yet defended the importance and effectiveness of ge neration-stage practice. In the first part of the paper\, I’ll consider ar guments against mental imagery as these appear in generation-stage practic e texts and the early Kālacakra tradition. In the second part\, I’ll turn to why we might think unreal mental imagery can nevertheless have real tra nsformative effects\, paying special attention to the ways Buddhist tantri c authors writing in Sanskrit take up ideas from the tradition of dramatic theory (nāṭyaśastra) and Sanskrit culture more broadly.
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\nW ith responses from Thomas Yarnall (Columbia University)
\n div>\nDATE: February 2nd\, 2024 p>\n
TIME: 5:30 pm EST
\nLOCATION: Philosophy Hall\, Room 716\, Columbia University
\n1150 Amsterdam Ave\, New York\, NY 10027
\nNOTE ON ENTRY FOR NON-COLUMBIA GUESTS: The door to P hilosophy Hall will only open with a Columbia University ID card. If you d o not have this card please arrive early where someone will be standing ou tside until the meeting begins. If you arrive late\, you can ask someone w alking nearby to let you in or contact Cole at cf2798@columbia.edu. Please o nly contact Cole as a final resource so as not to interrupt the talk.
\nNOTE REGARDING DONATIONS: Due to COVID-19\, donations are only accepted through Columbia University’s secure online giving form\, Giving to Columbia.
\nRSVP is required for dinner. Dinner will take place at a nearby restaurant. Please contact Cole at cf2798@columbia.edu fo r further information.
\nACCESSIBILITY STATEMENT: Columbia Un iversity encourages persons with disabilities to participate in its progra ms and activities. The University Seminars’ participants with dis- abiliti es who anticipate needing accommodations or who have questions about physi cal access may contact the Office of Disability Services at 212.854.2388 o r disability@columbia.edu. Disability accommodations\, including sign-la nguage interpreters\, are available on request. Requests for accommodation s must be made two weeks in advance. On campus\, seminar participants with disabilities should alert a Public Safety Officer if they need assistanc e accessing campus.
\nPLEASE VISIT OUR WEBSITE: https://universityseminars.columbia.edu/seminar s/comparative-philosophy/
\n(Please do not reply to this anno uncement. You may contact the Co-Chairs using the link above.)
\n< p>Comparative Philosophy Seminar:\n\n
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240202T173000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240202T193000 GEO:+40.811099;-73.962729 LOCATION:Columbia Religion @ 80 Claremont Ave\, New York\, NY 10027\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Mental Imagery\, Tantric Practice\, and the Drama of the Imaginatio n. Davey K. Tomlinson (Villanova) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/mental-imagery-tantric-p ractice-and-the-drama-of-the-imagination-davey-k-tomlinson-villanova/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Buddhism\,comparative\,imagination END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR- January 19 – Alex Watson (Ashoka University)
\n- February 2 – Davey Tomlinson (Villanova Univ ersity)
\n- April 5 – Laura Specker (Fordham University)
\n- M ay 3 – Daniel Stephens (University at Buffalo)
\n