BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//208.94.116.123//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7991@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T144055Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:CUNY CONTACT:https://philevents.org/event/show/109665 DESCRIPTION:
Tickets: https://forms.gle/rzEaVneRo3ohK5nu9.
DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230923 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20230925 GEO:+40.806777;-73.960523 LOCATION:Columbia Law School @ 435 W 116th St\, New York\, NY 10027\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Twin Conferences in Tribute to The Philosophy of Joseph Raz URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/twin-conferences-in-trib ute-to-the-philosophy-of-joseph-raz/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:conference\,legal\,value X-TICKETS-URL:https://forms.gle/rzEaVneRo3ohK5nu9 END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8014@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T144055Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:CUNY CONTACT:https://www.telosinstitute.net/conference2024/ DESCRIPTION:Democracy is often presented as the sine qua non of politics today. Yet our own democratic political orders across the West c onsistently fail to deliver the desiderata they promise to provide. Does t his failure arise in part from the theoretical insufficiency of convention al diagnoses of democracy’s challenges and ills? As the primaries for the 2024 U.S. presidential election open\, we invite participants to consider critically the status of democracy with an eye toward the concerns that ha ve defined Telos over its 55-year history.
\nThe main advantage of d emocracy over other political forms is that\, by allowing broader particip ation in decision-making\, it prevents domination of the many by the few. In theory\, it also fosters decision-making that is comparatively effectiv e and meaningful by allowing views and information from the many to be com municated efficiently to political leaders\, while also holding the latter to account for their actions. At the same time\, a major difficulty of de mocracy is that the rule by the many requires some procedure for translati ng a multitude of opinions into unified decisions and action. In addition\ , precisely by exercising its majority will\, the many can trammel the int egrity of the individual—the key threat that liberalism seeks to hold at b ay.
\nThese advantages—and\, especially\, these challenges—have prod uced two competing visions of democracy in the contemporary West. Their di vision reflects differences about the politics of representation and decis ion-making. On one hand\, liberals view democracy as the following of appr opriate procedures for channeling the opinions of the multitude through th e election of representatives. On the other hand\, populists might disrega rd such procedural restrictions to arrive at outcomes that are acclaimed b y the people directly.
\nWhile both sides nod to the importance of t he popular will\, both are in fact willing to denigrate it. The liberal ca mp reacts in horror when democratic elections result in the election of po pulists\, who are said to lack proper governing expertise\, as in the 2016 victory of Donald Trump. The populist camp charges conspiracy when electo ral results fail to reflect their own conception of the people’s will\, as in Trump’s reaction to his 2020 ouster. Depending on which camp is descri bing the times\, the false mediator of popular will is either the demagogu e or the bureaucrat—Telos has long opposed both.
\nDifferent narrati ves\, in turn\, have taken hold about democracy’s present challenges. From the point of view of the liberal proceduralist critique of demagogues\, t he means of moving from a multiplicity of opinions to a unified decision i nevitably involves discourse within a public sphere. This discourse depend s on a common understanding of historical facts\, as well as a public sphe re that allows different perspectives to face each other in debate. In our contemporary world\, however\, the breakdown of previous limits to access ing the public sphere has led to an inability to arrive at a consensus on the difference between fact and fiction\, as well as an increasing tendenc y of citizens to exist within a social media echo chamber of their own vie ws\, undermining the common ground that a public sphere presupposes.
\nAt the same time\, public debate necessarily implicates values and iden tities that have an ultimately mythic basis that cannot be rationally dete rmined. People’s opinions\, moreover\, are invariably shaped by leaders as much as the people shape what leaders ought to do. Experts lament how thi s representational dynamic undermines the procedures that govern and chann el the representation of the popular will. Yet the narrative aspect of rep resentation is an ineradicable element of the way in which the popular wil l coalesces. The process of narrativized representation will never be an e ntirely rational one\, and the prominence of media personalities such as R eagan\, Trump\, and Zelensky as politicians underlines the futility of att empting to rid the public sphere of drama and spectacle.
\nFor the p opulist\, by contrast\, the primary threat to democracy lies in bureaucrac y. In his 2016 end run around the political establishment\, Trump’s electo ral success was driven by a broader critique of the administrative state’s undermining of democratic process. The rise of the managerial bureaucrati c state that was set in motion by the development of the welfare state in the twentieth century has created a class divide between managers and mana ged that has shifted decision-making power over the conditions of everyday life away from individuals and toward government and corporate bureaucrac ies. Because more and more of our economic and social welfare is under the direct influence of the state\, the resultant bloated administrative stat e has now become prey to a frenzy of lobbyists\, who further distance the people from political decision-making. The protections of minority rights that constitute the liberal aspect of today’s democracies have turned comm unities into special interests that lobby administrators to pass on privil eges to favored groups. The result has been a growing restriction of freed om of expression in the public sphere and an eroding of a unifying basis f or constructing a political order now dominated by the collusion of bureau cracy with corporations.
\nWhile the liberal critique of demagoguery resorts to more government controls that exacerbate the expansion of bure aucracy\, the populist critique of bureaucracy has attempted to dismantle government without considering how to establish mechanisms that would take over the functions that bureaucracies have coopted. Focusing on oppositio n to government\, the populist perspective often lacks any sense of altern ative institutional structures that could remedy the administration and co mmodification of everyday life.
\nBoth sides have contributed to a p olarization of views that threatens the underlying consensus necessary for democratic politics. The political gridlock that has ensued from their di verging diagnoses has meant that our political orders consistently fail to deliver peace\, prosperity\, and accountable government. Moreover\, regar dless of the rhetoric or credentials of those in power\, democracy today s eems always to leave us with broadly the same basic policies\, despite som e of them being deeply unpopular.
\nWe invite those who are interest ed in presenting at the 2024 Telos Conference to consider critically the s tatus of democracy today by addressing one or more of the following questi ons:
\nDemocratic Values
\nDemocracy and the Administrative State
\nDemocracy and the Public Sphere
\nDemocracy and Relig ion
\nDemocracy and Authorit arianism
\nAbstract Submi ssions
\nWhatever specific questions you address\, we invit e you to present your analysis with an eye toward the long-standing concer ns of the Telos-Paul Piccone Institute and thereby to help develop a trenc hant\, independent view of democracy that can inform both critique and pra ctical action within our present historical moment. Please submit a short c.v. and an abstract of up to 250 words by October 15\, 2023\, to telosnyc 2024@telosinstitute.net and place “The 2024 Telos Conference” in the email ’s subject line. Please direct questions to Professor Mark G. E. Kelly\, W estern Sydney University\, M.Kelly@westernsydney.edu.au.
\nC onference Location
\nThe conference will take place at the John D. Calandra Italian American Institute in New York City from Friday\, March 22\, to Saturday\, March 23\, 2024.
\n DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240322 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240324 GEO:+40.754894;-73.981856 LOCATION:The Telos-Paul Piccone Institute @ 25 W 43rd St 17th Floor\, New Y ork\, NY 10036\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Democracy Today? URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/democracy-today/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:cfp\,conference\,legal\,political\,religion\,social END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7644@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T144055Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:NYU CONTACT:https://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/lawphilosophy/colloquium DESCRIPTION:The Colloquium in Legal\, Political\, and Social Philosophy was founded by Ronald Dworkin and Thomas Nagel in 1987. It is the original model for all of NYU Law’s colloquia. The Colloquium is now convened by L iam Murphy\, Samuel Scheffler\, and Jeremy Waldron\, two of whom will host in any given year.
\nEach week on Thursday a legal theorist or mora l or political philosopher presents a paper to the group\, which consists of students\, faculty from the Law School and other departments of NYU\, a nd faculty from other universities. The choice of subject is left to the p aper’s author\, within the general boundaries of the Colloquium’s subjects \, and the discussions are therefore not connected by any structured theme for the term as a whole\, though in past years certain central topics wer e canvassed in several weeks’ discussion. The Colloquium aims\, not to pur sue any particular subject\, but to explore new work in considerable depth and so allow students to develop their own skill in theoretical analysis.
\nEach week’s paper is posted at least a week in advance on this pa ge\, and participants are expected to have read it.
\nThe public sessions of the colloquium will take place on Thursdays\, in Le ster Pollock Colloquium Room\, Furman Hall\, 9th floor\, from 4:00 to 7:0 0 pm.
\nColloquium 2021
\nP rofessors Liam Murphy and Samuel Scheffler
\nSeptember 2nd< br />\nKim Ferzan\, University of Pennsylvania\, Law
\nRethinking Credit for Time Served
\nSeptember
9th
\nLiam Murphy\, NYU
International Responsibility for Global Environment Harm: Collective and Individual
\nSeptember 17th ( Friday 2.0
0-5.00)
\nMoshe Halbertal\, NYU
September 23rd
\nJeff McMahan\, Oxford
September 3
0th
\nEmma Kaufman\, NYU Law
October 7th
\nRick Pildes\,
NYU Law
October 14th
\nSamuel Scheffler\, NYU
Octobe
r 21st
\nSteve Darwall\, Yale\, Philosophy
October 28th
\nChris Kutz\, University of California\, Berkeley\, Law
November
4th
\nAnthony Appiah\, NYU
November 11th
\nJohann Frick\
, University of California\, Berkeley\, Philosophy
November 18th\nTeresa Bejan\, Oxford
\nDecember 2nd
\nRuth Chang\, Oxfor
d
The Colloquium in Legal\, Political\, and Social Philosophy was founded by Ronald Dworkin and Thomas Nagel in 1987. It is the original model for all of NYU Law’s colloquia. The Colloquium is now convened by L iam Murphy\, Samuel Scheffler\, and Jeremy Waldron\, two of whom will host in any given year.
\nEach week on Thursday a legal theorist or mora l or political philosopher presents a paper to the group\, which consists of students\, faculty from the Law School and other departments of NYU\, a nd faculty from other universities. The choice of subject is left to the p aper’s author\, within the general boundaries of the Colloquium’s subjects \, and the discussions are therefore not connected by any structured theme for the term as a whole\, though in past years certain central topics wer e canvassed in several weeks’ discussion. The Colloquium aims\, not to pur sue any particular subject\, but to explore new work in considerable depth and so allow students to develop their own skill in theoretical analysis.
\nEach week’s paper is posted at least a week in advance on this pa ge\, and participants are expected to have read it.
\nThe public sessions of the colloquium will take place on Thursdays\, in Le ster Pollock Colloquium Room\, Furman Hall\, 9th floor\, from 4:00 to 7:0 0 pm.
\nColloquium 2021
\nP rofessors Liam Murphy and Samuel Scheffler
\nSeptember 2nd< br />\nKim Ferzan\, University of Pennsylvania\, Law
\nRethinking Credit for Time Served
\nSeptember
9th
\nLiam Murphy\, NYU
International Responsibility for Global Environment Harm: Collective and Individual
\nSeptember 17th ( Friday 2.0
0-5.00)
\nMoshe Halbertal\, NYU
September 23rd
\nJeff McMahan\, Oxford
September 3
0th
\nEmma Kaufman\, NYU Law
October 7th
\nRick Pildes\,
NYU Law
October 14th
\nSamuel Scheffler\, NYU
Octobe
r 21st
\nSteve Darwall\, Yale\, Philosophy
October 28th
\nChris Kutz\, University of California\, Berkeley\, Law
November
4th
\nAnthony Appiah\, NYU
November 11th
\nJohann Frick\
, University of California\, Berkeley\, Philosophy
November 18th\nTeresa Bejan\, Oxford
\nDecember 2nd
\nRuth Chang\, Oxfor
d
THE COLUMBIA SOCI ETY FOR COMPARATIVE PHILOSOPHY
\n\n
< b>Presents: Li Zehou on the ‘Deep Str uctures of Confucianism’
\nLead Presenter: Andrew Lambert (College of Staten Island\ , CUNY)
\nDiscussa nts: Robert A. Carleo III (East China Normal University)\, Emma Bucht el (Hong Kong Education University)
\nABSTRACT: Contemporary Chinese intellectual Li Zeh ou’s cross-cultural methodology blends traditional Confucian thought with thinkers such as Kant and Marx. This seminar addresses the question of cul ture and its role in Li’s thought. Li has made several claims about how a settled cultural tradition influences the subjects within it. One such cla im concerns the existence of ‘deep structures’ of Confucianism\, as outlin ed in this preparatory reading . The idea is that culture\, history\, and social practice (col lectively\, a tradition) shape human psychology (including the formation o f concepts\, emotions\, and values) in ways not always apparent to the sub ject. Within the Chinese tradition\, Confucianism constitutes such a deep structure\, and its effects cannot be captured by textual studies alone\, nor studies of material culture. Rather\, the deep structure is articulate d in terms of an emergent shared subjectivity. Such traditions can evolve and ultimately dissolve\; nevertheless\, their effects are deep-rooted. Th is seminar meeting will aim to identify the parameters of Li’s ambitious t heoretical framework and its plausibility\, and to explore connections wit h current work in related fields\, such as cultural and empirical psycholo gy.
\nDATE: Ma rch 25\, 2022
\nTI ME: 6:30 – 8:00 pm EST
\nThis seminar will take place via Zoom (please scroll down for the full invitation). Below you will find the link to join the meeting. Here is an instruction manual to help you familiarize yourself with the program. In addition to fam iliarizing yourself with the program’s basic functions\, there are two thi ngs we ask you to do before the meeting can start. First\, you will need t o sign in by typing your name in the chat. Subsequently\, we will have to agree on the privacy policy for the meeting. The privacy policy provided b y the Columbia University Seminars Office will be read aloud. To indicate your agreement\, you will raise your virtual Zoom hand in the Participants panel. In the manual\, you will find step-by-step instructions of how to sign in and to raise your hand.
\nNote Regarding Donations: Due to COVID-19\, donations are only accepted through Columbia University’s secure online giving form \, Giving to Columbia.
\n\n
Accessibility Statement: Columbia University encourages p ersons with disabilities to participate in its programs and activities. Th e University Seminars participants with dis- abilities who anticipate need ing accommodations or who have questions about physical access may contact the Office of Disability Services at 212.85 4.2388 or disability@columbia.edu. Disabili ty accommodations\, including sign-language interpreters\, are available o n request. Requests for accommodations must be made two weeks in advance. On campus\, seminar participants with disabilities should alert a Public S afety Officer if they need assistance accessing campus.
\nPLEASE VISIT OUR WEBSITE: https://universityseminars.columbia.edu/seminars/co mparative-philosophy/
\nDTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220325T183000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220325T200000 GEO:+40.712775;-74.005973 LOCATION:Zoom @ New York\, NY\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Li Zehou. Deep Structures of Confucianism URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/li-zehou-deep-structures -of-confucianism/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Chinese\,comparative\,Confucianism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7872@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T144055Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U CONTACT:https://universityseminars.columbia.edu/seminars/comparative-philos ophy/ DESCRIPTION:
With responses from Timothy Connolly (East Stroudsburg University)
\nABSTRACT: Recent philosophical discussions on compassion focus on the value and the
nature of compassion as an emotion. Ancient Asian philosophical tradition
s such as Confucianism and Buddhism\, however\, emphasize compassion as a
character trait that should be nurtured. This paper examines the insights
drawn from these traditions to help inform the nurturing of compassion. Fo
r example\, is empathy a necessary tool? What is the role of love and car
e? Does self-reflection contribute to the process?
\n
\n
Dinner will be kindly o ffered by the Columbia University Seminars.
\nRSVP is required for dinner. Please email Lucilla with eating requ irements at lm3335@columbia.edu.< span class='gmail-Apple-converted-space'>
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221014T173000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221014T193000 GEO:+40.806753;-73.959136 LOCATION:Faculty House\, Columbia U @ 64 Morningside Dr\, New York\, NY 100 27\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:How to nurture compassion? Some lessons from Asian philosophical tr aditions. Sin Yee Chan (U Vermont) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/how-to-nurture-compassio n-some-lessons-from-asian-philosophical-traditions-sin-yee-chan-u-vermont/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Buddhism\,Confucianism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7831@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T144055Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U CONTACT:https://philosophy.columbia.edu/content/colloquium-lectures-2022-20 23 DESCRIPTION:Naked Statistical Evidence and Verdictive Justice
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221027T161000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221027T180000 GEO:+40.807536;-73.962573 LOCATION:716 Philosophy Hall @ New York\, NY 10027\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Naked Statistical Evidence and Verdictive Justice. Sherri Roush (UC LA) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/sherri-roush-ucla/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:legal\,statistics END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8029@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T144055Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:NYU CONTACT:https://www.law.nyu.edu/centers/lawphilosophy/colloquium DESCRIPTION:Colloquium 2023
\nProfessors Jeremy Waldron and Liam Murphy
\nSeptember 7th
\nBonni
e Honig\, Brown University
\nFatal Forgiveness: Eurip
ides\, Austin\, Arendt\, Cavell
September 14th
\nJeremy W
aldron\, NYU
September 21st
\nAlice Crary\, The New School
September 28th
\nDavid Enoch\, University of Oxford
Oct
ober 5th
\nGina Schouten\, Harvard University
October 12th
\nDaryl Levinson\, NYU
October 19th
\nBarbara Levenbook\,
North Carolina State University
October 26th
\nRob Howse\, NY
U
November 2nd
\nTrevor Morrison\, NYU
November 9th\nJohn Goldberg\, Harvard University
\nNovember 16th
\nCour
tney Cox\, Fordham University
November 30th
\nJuliana Bidadan
ure\, Stanford University
\n
The Colloquium in Legal\, Poli tical\, and Social Philosophy was founded by Ronald Dworkin and Thomas Nag el in 1987. It is the original model for all of NYU Law’s colloquia. The C olloquium is now convened by Liam Murphy\, Samuel Scheffler\, and Jeremy W aldron\, two of whom will host in any given year.
\nEach week on Thu rsday a legal theorist or moral or political philosopher presents a paper to the group\, which consists of students\, faculty from the Law School an d other departments of NYU\, and faculty from other universities. The choi ce of subject is left to the paper’s author\, within the general boundarie s of the Colloquium’s subjects\, and the discussions are therefore not con nected by any structured theme for the term as a whole\, though in past ye ars certain central topics were canvassed in several weeks’ discussion. Th e Colloquium aims\, not to pursue any particular subject\, but to explore new work in considerable depth and so allow students to develop their own skill in theoretical analysis.
\nEach week’s paper is posted at leas t a week in advance on this page\, and participants are expected to have r ead it.
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230907T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230907T190000 GEO:+40.730147;-73.998916 LOCATION:Lester Pollock Colloquium Room\, Furman Hall\, 9th flr @ 245 Sulli van St\, New York\, NY 10012\, USA RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230921T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230928T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231005T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231012T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231019T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231026T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231102T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231109T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231116T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20231130T160000 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Colloquium in Legal\, Political\, and Social Philosophy URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/colloquium-in-legal-poli tical-and-social-philosophy-9/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:legal\,political\,social END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8044@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T144055Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U CONTACT:http://universityseminars.columbia.edu/seminars/comparative-philoso phy/ DESCRIPTION:What is an appropriate response to humiliating treatm ents such as insults? This question is not only relevant to today’s discou rse but has also piqued the curiosity of thinkers in classical Chinese phi losophy. The Warring States period debate regarding whether one’s inner se nse of shame can shield one from insulting situations and from experiencin g shame is frequently presented as a one-sided narrative that focuses on t he Confucian texts. Meanwhile\, the views of their rival thinkers\, such a s the Daoist\, legalist\, or much-neglected Songzi (3rd century BCE)\, are rarely the focus of attention. This paper brings Songzi\, a key player in the debate of emotions as responses to external triggers\, into the pictu re and restores the historical intellectual discourse over the topic of wh at constitutes an appropriate response to humiliating situations such as i nsults. More importantly\, I point out the philosophical significance of t his debate\, namely how Songzi prompts Xunzi to respond to an ambiguity wi thin the Confucian doctrine: The early Confucians appear to think that an individual’s internal virtues can isolate and shield one from hostile exte rnal stimuli while also maintaining that the external environment impacts one’s moral cultivation and moral life in significant ways. Xunzi’s strate gic move\, I argue\, is to give credit to both an inner sense of shame and the function of external stimuli in inducing negative emotions\, thus mak ing an important philosophical concession compared to Confucius and Menciu s.
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n< p>With responses from Nalei Chen (New York University)\n\n
Th 1/25/24: Kate Manne
\nTh 2/1/24: Scott Shapiro
\nTh 2/8/24: Ekow Yankah
\nTh 2/15/24: Tommie Shelby
\nTh 2 /22/24 Gideon Rosen
\nTh 2/29/24: Sabeel Rahman
\nTh 3/7/24: A my Sepinwall
\nTh 3/14/24: Erik Encarnacion
\nTh 3/21/24: Seyl a Benhabib
\nTh 4/4/24: Amalia Amaya
\nTh 4/11/24: Debbie Hell man
\nTh 4/18/24: Mala Chatterjee
\nTh 4/25/24: Liam Murphy
\nContact Aditi Bagchi: https://www.fordham.edu/school -of-law/faculty/directory/full-time/aditi-bagchi/
DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240125T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240125T190000 GEO:+40.861457;-73.885277 LOCATION:Fordham Law @ Bronx County\, Bronx\, NY 10458\, USA RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240201T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240208T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240215T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240222T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240229T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240307T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240314T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240321T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240404T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240411T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240418T160000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20240425T160000 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Law & Philosophy Colloquium URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/law-philosophy-colloquiu m/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:legal END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR