BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//208.94.116.123//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8000@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T103741Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Fordham CONTACT:https://philevents.org/event/show/110241 DESCRIPTION:Richard J. Bernstein first encountered John Dewey’s pragmatist naturalism as a graduate student at Yale University\, where “Dewey’s natu ralistic vision of the relation of experience and nature—how human beings as natural creatures are related to the rest of nature—spoke deeply to me. ” This early enthusiasm for Dewey’s naturalistic vision never left him. Du ring the final years of his long life\, Bernstein finished two books that return to issues of pragmatist naturalism.\n· His Pragmatic Naturali sm: John Dewey’s Living Legacy (2020)\, traces differing versions of Dewey an naturalism in the works of contemporary philosophers\, including Robert Brandom\, John McDowell\, Richard Rorty\, Wilfrid Sellars\, Peter Godfrey -Smith\, Philip Kitcher\, Bjorn Ramberg\, David Macarthur\, Steven Levine\ , Mark Johnson\, Robert Sinclair\, Huw Price\, and Joseph Rouse.\n· In his final book\, The Vicissitudes of Nature (2022)\, Bernstein clarifie s his own pragmatist naturalism in relation to the thinking of earlier mod ern philosophers: Spinoza\, Hume\, Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\, Nietzsche\, and F reud.\nThis conference will critically assess and expand the legacy of Ber nstein’s final pragmatic naturalism as expressed in these two books. Accep ted papers will be collected for publication.\nThe New York Pragmatist For um\nPaper topics may include: \n● Bernstein’s discussion of Dewey’s t hinking in relation to contemporary philosophers’ formulations of naturali sm in Pragmatic Naturalism: John Dewey’s Living Legacy.\n● Bernstein’ s interpretation of an earlier thinker’s understanding of naturalism or na ture in The Vicissitudes of Nature (Spinoza\, Hume\, Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\, Nietzsche\, or Freud).\n● A larger theme or problem that brings one of these Bernstein’s texts into conversation with philosophical naturalism \, either particular expressions or conceptual issues.\n● The consequ ences of one or both of these texts for questions of naturalism in relatio n to wider social and political questions\, e.g.\, democracy\, praxis\, cr itique.\nAbstracts: Please submit an abstract of no more than 500 words to tara@newschool.edu.\nSubmission Deadline: May 22\, 2023 \nNYPF Conference Committee:\nSergio Gallegos\, John Jay College of Criminal Justice\nJudit h Green\, Fordham University\nBrendan Hogan\, New York University\nTara Ma strelli\, New School for Social Research\nDavid Woods\, New York Universit y DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230929 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20231001 GEO:+40.770718;-73.98539 LOCATION:Fordham University at Lincoln Center @ Leon Lowenstein Center\, 11 3 W 60th St\, New York\, NY 10023\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Nature’s Vicissitudes: Richard J. Bernstein’s final pragmatic natur alism URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/natures-vicissitudes-ric hard-j-bernsteins-final-pragmatic-naturalism/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\nRichard J. Be rnstein first encountered John Dewey’s pragmatist naturalism as a graduate student at Yale University\, where “Dewey’s naturalistic vision of the r elation of experience and nature—how human beings as natural creatures are related to the rest of nature—spoke deeply to me.” This early enthusiasm for Dewey’s naturalistic vision never left him. During the final years of his long life\, Bernstein finished two books that return to issues of prag matist naturalism.
\n· His Pragmatic Naturalism: John Dewe y’s Living Legacy (2020)\, traces differing versions of Deweyan natur alism in the works of contemporary philosophers\, including Robert Brandom \, John McDowell\, Richard Rorty\, Wilfrid Sellars\, Peter Godfrey-Smith\, Philip Kitcher\, Bjorn Ramberg\, David Macarthur\, Steven Levine\, Mark J ohnson\, Robert Sinclair\, Huw Price\, and Joseph Rouse.
\n· I n his final book\, The Vicissitudes of Nature (2022)\, B ernstein clarifies his own pragmatist naturalism in relation to the thinki ng of earlier modern philosophers: Spinoza\, Hume\, Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\, Nietzsche\, and Freud.
\nThis conference will critically assess and expand the legacy of Bernstein’s final pragmatic naturalism as expressed i n these two books. Accepted papers will be collected for publication.
\nThe New York Pragmatist Forum
\nPaper topics may include:
\n● Bernstein’s discussion of Dew ey’s thinking in relation to contemporary philosophers’ formulations of na turalism in Pragmatic Naturalism: John Dewey’s Living Legacy.
\n● Bernstein’s interpretation of an earlier thinker’s understandi ng of naturalism or nature in The Vicissitudes of Nature (Spinoza \, Hume\, Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\, Nietzsche\, or Freud).
\n● A la rger theme or problem that brings one of these Bernstein’s texts into conv ersation with philosophical naturalism\, either particular expressions or conceptual issues.
\n● The consequences of one or both of these texts for questions of naturalism in relation to wider social and politic al questions\, e.g.\, democracy\, praxis\, critique.
\nAbstr acts: Please submit an abstract of no more than 500 words to tara@newschool.edu.
\nSubmission Deadlin e: May 22\, 2023
\nNYPF Conference Committee:
\nSerg io Gallegos\, John Jay College of Criminal Justice
\nJudith Green\,
Fordham University
\nBrendan Hogan\, New York University
Tara Mastrelli\, New School for Social Research
\nDavid Woods\, New York University
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:cfa\,conference\,naturalism\,pragmatism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8089@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T103741Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://sites.google.com/newschool.edu/unmasking-objectivity/home DESCRIPTION:How does objectivity shape power\, and how does power shape obj ectivity?\nWelcome to “Unmasking Objectivity: A Critical Examination of th e Nexus between Universal Truth Claims and Emergent Power Structures\,” a conference that plunges into the intricate relationship between knowledge and power. In this conference\, we will uncover how epistemological standp oints intersect with systems of coercion\, marginalization\, and oppressio n. Our topic extends to alternative visions of knowledge\, truth\, and lea rning\, offering the potential for shared beliefs while addressing the adv erse impacts of entrenched power structures.\nHow have claims to absolute\ , objective\, or scientific truth driven oppression through ideologies lik e religious absolutism\, colonialism\, technocracy\, and scientific sexism and racism? Contemporary debates further emphasize the significance of th is intersection.\nOur discourse will also scrutinize epistemic injustice\, examining whether universalist epistemologies privilege specific knowledg e systems while silencing valid alternatives. We aim to shed light on soci al and political issues overlooked by dominant knowledge frameworks throug h inclusive dialogues. This conference fosters critical exploration and in clusive discourse\, drawing on interdisciplinary studies in philosophy\, s ociology\, and political theory.\nTogether\, we will assess the ethical im plications of our epistemological practices and explore pathways to creati ng more equitable systems of knowledge and social learning. Join us at “Un masking Objectivity” as we navigate the intricate web of knowledge and pow er\, aiming for a just and inclusive future where the notion of objectivit y is both scrutinized and harnessed for social transformation.\n https://s ites.google.com/newschool.edu/unmasking-objectivity/home \nhttps://phileve nts.org/event/show/116553\nhttps://philevents.org/event/show/116561 DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20240321 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20240324 GEO:+40.736924;-73.992688 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ Albert and Vera List Academic Center \, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Unmasking Objectivity: A Critical Examination of the Nexus between Universal Truth Claims and Emergent Power Structures Conference URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/unmasking-objectivity-a- critical-examination-of-the-nexus-between-universal-truth-claims-and-emerg ent-power-structures-conference/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nHow does objectivity shape power\, and how does power shape ob jectivity?
\nWelcome to “Unmasking Objectivity: A Critical Examinati on of the Nexus between Universal Truth Claims and Emergent Power Structur es\,” a conference that plunges into the intricate relationship between kn owledge and power. In this conference\, we will uncover how epistemologica l standpoints intersect with systems of coercion\, marginalization\, and o ppression. Our topic extends to alternative visions of knowledge\, truth\, and learning\, offering the potential for shared beliefs while addressing the adverse impacts of entrenched power structures.
\nHow have clai ms to absolute\, objective\, or scientific truth driven oppression through ideologies like religious absolutism\, colonialism\, technocracy\, and sc ientific sexism and racism? Contemporary debates further emphasize the sig nificance of this intersection.
\nOur discourse will also scrutinize epistemic injustice\, examining whether universalist epistemologies privi lege specific knowledge systems while silencing valid alternatives. We aim to shed light on social and political issues overlooked by dominant knowl edge frameworks through inclusive dialogues. This conference fosters criti cal exploration and inclusive discourse\, drawing on interdisciplinary stu dies in philosophy\, sociology\, and political theory.
\nTogether\, we will assess the ethical implications of our epistemological practices a nd explore pathways to creating more equitable systems of knowledge and so cial learning. Join us at “Unmasking Objectivity” as we navigate the intri cate web of knowledge and power\, aiming for a just and inclusive future w here the notion of objectivity is both scrutinized and harnessed for socia l transformation.
\n\n\n\n\nThe importanc e of incorporating value pluralism into a theory of justice is recognized in many conceptualizations of justice. This pluralism is often seen as a r eason to attend to a range of perspectives\, perspectives which can functi on as a source of information in determining which principles should guide justice. However\, philosophy’s ability to properly attend to different p erspectives has received extensive attention in the criticisms of various non-ideal theorists\, who argue that ideal-theoretical philosophy runs the risk of excluding important aspects of actual social problems. Taking the se criticisms on board\, this paper builds on non-ideal theory by arguing for a Wittgensteinian family resemblance approach to justice. I will expla in how this linguistic practice-embedded understanding of justice can be a helpful tool for non-ideal theory\, as it can give us insight into why\, in various similar but different cases\, the notion of justice is seen as applicable. In light of this approach\, I will suggest a reorientation of the pluralist demand towards an empirical starting point.
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:justice\,social\,wittgenstein END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8143@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T103741Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/rosauramartinez DESCRIPTION:Analyzing the Mexican case of collectives of women currently lo oking for their disappeared relatives due to an escalation of violence rel ated to the so-called War against Drugs that former president Felipe Calde rón (2006–2012) started\, this essay develops a new conception of politic s grounded not only on rational thought but also on affect. These collecti ves put forward a materialistic\, feminist\, and performative mode of poli tics. Publicly lamenting their losses and literally digging bodies out of Mexican land\, these women perform and recover the citizenship that the Me xican state has de facto disavowed of them. I propose conceptualizing them as “bad victims” since their taking action does not take away their pain\ ; rather\, the public exposure of their lament actually turns them into po litical agents.\n \nBio:\nRosaura Martínez Ruiz is Full Professor of Philo sophy at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and a member of the National System of Researchers\, level III. She was coordinator of the research projects “Philosophers after Freud” and “Philosophy and Psych oanalysis as Critical Borders of the Political.” She is the author of Freu d y Derrida: escritura y psique (2013) and Eros: Más allá de la pulsión de muerte (2017). This last book has been translated into English and publis hed by Fordham University Press (2021). She has coordinated several collec tive books and published articles on the intersection between psychoanalys is and philosophy and on the field of the psychopolitical. In 2017 she was awarded the Research Prize in Humanities by the Mexican Academy of Scienc es\; in 2019 she was a Fulbright Scholar\; in 2021 she received the Sor Ju ana Inez de la Cruz UNAM recognition\; and during the Fall 2023 she was th e Tinker Visiting Professor at Columbia University. She is part of the adv isory board of the “International Consortium of Critical Theory Programs” coordinated by Judith Butler.\nTickets: https://event.newschool.edu/rosaur amartinez. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240201T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240201T190000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Mexican Antigones: In Search of a Stolen Mourning\, presented by Ro saura Martinez URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/mexican-antigones-in-sea rch-of-a-stolen-mourning-presented-by-rosaura-martinez/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nAnalyzing the Mexican case of collectives of women currently looking for their disappea red relatives due to an escalation of violence related to the so-called Wa r against Drugs that former president Felipe Calderón (2006–2012) started \, this essay develops a new conception of politics grounded not only on r ational thought but also on affect. These collectives put forward a materi alistic\, feminist\, and performative mode of politics. Publicly lamenting their losses and literally digging bodies out of Mexican land\, these wom en perform and recover the citizenship that the Mexican state has de facto disavowed of them. I propose conceptualizing them as “bad victims” since their taking action does not take away their pain\; rather\, the public ex posure of their lament actually turns them into political agents.
\n\n
Bio:
\nRosaura Martínez Ruiz is Full Prof essor of Philosophy at the National Autonomous University of Mexico (UNAM) and a member of the National System of Researchers\, level III. She was c oordinator of the research projects “Philosophers after Freud” and “Philos ophy and Psychoanalysis as Critical Borders of the Political.” She is the author of Freud y Derrida: escritura y psique (2013) and Eros : Más allá de la pulsión de muerte (2017). This last book has been tr anslated into English and published by Fordham University Press (2021). Sh e has coordinated several collective books and published articles on the i ntersection between psychoanalysis and philosophy and on the field of the psychopolitical. In 2017 she was awarded the Research Prize in Humanities by the Mexican Academy of Sciences\; in 2019 she was a Fulbright Scholar\; in 2021 she received the Sor Juana Inez de la Cruz UNAM recognition\; and during the Fall 2023 she was the Tinker Visiting Professor at Columbia Un iversity. She is part of the advisory board of the “International Consorti um of Critical Theory Programs” coordinated by Judith Butler.
\nTick ets: https://event.newschool.edu/rosauramartinez.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:Latin\,political X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/rosauramartinez END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8140@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T103741Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/eyoewara DESCRIPTION:This talk reads contemporary debates about structural racism an d US history from the perspective of philosophical questions about identit y and difference. While many people have argued that America needs to come to terms with or “work through” the racism in its history that has shaped and continues to shape its present structures\, it remains difficult to e xplain what connects this past and the present. Are we talking about one r acism with many different past and present forms? Or are there multiple ra cisms that only share some similar features? In this talk\, I draw attenti on to how these divisions play out particularly in contemporary Black Stud ies and argue that the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze can offer us resources for thinking about these questions through his discussions of repetition. I argue that understanding our conversations about structural racism and history as conversations about a racism that repeats\, can help us to bett er understand why racism seems to reappear\, how to think its disparate fo rms together\, and what presuppositions operate in many attempts to “work through” the past.\nBio: Eyo Ewara is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago. His teaching and research explores the relatio nships between 20th Century Continental Philosophy\, Critical Philosophy o f Race\, and Queer Theory. His work has appeared in Theory and Event\, Pu ncta\, Philosophy Today\, Critical Philosophy of Race\, Political Theology \, and other venues. His current research project is particularly interest ed in engaging work in Continental Philosophy\, Queer Theory\, and Black S tudies to address questions of identity and difference amongst concepts of race\, forms of racism\, and forms of anti-racism. How can we better acco unt for the relations between at times radically disparate concepts\, stru ctures\, and practices such that they can all specifically and recognizabl y be called racial? What might our account of these relations say about ou r ability to address racism’s harms?\nTickets: https://event.newschool.edu /eyoewara. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240328T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240328T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Strange Returns: Racism\, Repetition and Working Through the Past presented by Eyo Ewara URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/strange-returns-racism-r epetition-and-working-through-the-past-presented-by-eyo-ewara/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nThis talk rea ds contemporary debates about structural racism and US history from the pe rspective of philosophical questions about identity and difference. While many people have argued that America needs to come to terms with or “work through” the racism in its history that has shaped and continues to shape its present structures\, it remains difficult to explain what connects thi s past and the present. Are we talking about one racism with many differen t past and present forms? Or are there multiple racisms that only share so me similar features? In this talk\, I draw attention to how these division s play out particularly in contemporary Black Studies and argue that the p hilosophy of Gilles Deleuze can offer us resources for thinking about thes e questions through his discussions of repetition. I argue that understand ing our conversations about structural racism and history as conversations about a racism that repeats\, can help us to better understand why racism seems to reappear\, how to think its disparate forms together\, and what presuppositions operate in many attempts to “work through” the past.
\nBio: Eyo Ewara is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago. His teaching and research explores the relatio nships between 20th Century Continental Philosophy\, Critical Philosophy o f Race\, and Queer Theory. His work has appeared in Theory and Event\, Pu ncta\, Philosophy Today\, Critical Philosophy of Race\, Political Theology \, and other venues. His current research project is particularly interest ed in engaging work in Continental Philosophy\, Queer Theory\, and Black S tudies to address questions of identity and difference amongst concepts of race\, forms of racism\, and forms of anti-racism. How can we better acco unt for the relations between at times radically disparate concepts\, stru ctures\, and practices such that they can all specifically and recognizabl y be called racial? What might our account of these relations say about ou r ability to address racism’s harms?
\nTickets: https://event .newschool.edu/eyoewara.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:history\,race X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/eyoewara END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR