BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//208.94.116.123//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8048@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/ipnh2023 DESCRIPTION:Join us for a series of keynote presentations as part of the 20 23 Institute for Philosophy and New Humanities: Mind-Dependent Artifacts: Artifact-Dependent Minds.\nArtifacts are a primary object of study in the humanities. They are products and\, thus\, manifestations of human thought \, action\, and self-determination without which they cannot be understood . At the same time\, human mindedness depends on artifacts\, and as well a s other objects – a dependence that is manifest in the form of artifacts. Human mindedness and the reality of artifacts are therefore intertwined in complex ways.\nOur Fall institute meeting 2023 Institute will consider wa ys in which human mindedness and the reality of artifacts are dialecticall y intertwined. Of special interest will be automatically or mechanically p roduced artifacts\, and AI systems as artifacts that are neither inert cau sal models of human thinking nor independently minded entities. The ontolo gy of such products thus needs to be calibrated in light of their contribu tion to the deep diversity of the mutual dependence of mindedness and arti facts. Some questions our seminar will address include: How do AI-research and AI-systems structure and restructure the historical\, diverse articul ation of human mindedness? How does our understanding of these and other a rtifacts shape our self-conception at the most fundamental level?\n \nWe w ill explore these issues in the ontology\, epistemology\, and humanistic s tudy of AI and other artifacts together with distinguished keynote speaker s:\nMonday\, September 11\, 4pm\nHans Ulrich Gumbrecht: UNFOLDING A FUZZY FUTURE? Dimensions for Thinking about “Singularity”\n\nTuesday\, September 12\, 10am\nCameron Buckner: Understanding Progress in AI Using Empiricist Philosophy of Mind\n\nWednesday\, September 13\, 3pm\nKanta Dihal\nWednes day\, September 13\, 5pm\nDavid Chalmers: Forum Humanum Lecture\n\nThursda y\, September 14\, 4pm\nNandi Theunissen: Rethinking Regress Arguments for the Value of Humanity\n\nFriday\, September 15\, 4pm\nKalindi Vora\nTicke ts: https://event.newschool.edu/ipnh2023#rsvp. DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230911 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20230916 GEO:+40.735498;-73.993501 LOCATION:Starr Foundation Hall (UL102) @ 63 5th Ave\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Mind-Dependent Artifacts: Artifact-Dependent Minds URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/mind-dependent-artifacts -artifact-dependent-minds/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\nJoin us for a series of keynote presentations as part of the 2023 Institute for Philoso phy and New Humanities: Mind-Dependent Artifacts: Artifact-Dependent Minds .
\nArtifacts are a primary object of study in the humanities. They are products and\, thus\, manifestations of human thought\, action\, and s elf-determination without which they cannot be understood. At the same tim e\, human mindedness depends on artifacts\, and as well as other objects – a dependence that is manifest in the form of artifacts. Human mindedness and the reality of artifacts are therefore intertwined in complex ways.
\nOur Fall institute meeting 2023 Institute will consider ways in whic h human mindedness and the reality of artifacts are dialectically intertwi ned. Of special interest will be automatically or mechanically produced ar tifacts\, and AI systems as artifacts that are neither inert causal models of human thinking nor independently minded entities. The ontology of such products thus needs to be calibrated in light of their contribution to th e deep diversity of the mutual dependence of mindedness and artifacts. Som e questions our seminar will address include: How do AI-research and AI-sy stems structure and restructure the historical\, diverse articulation of h uman mindedness? How does our understanding of these and other artifacts s hape our self-conception at the most fundamental level?
\n\n
We will explore these issues in the ontology\, epistemology\, and humanist ic study of AI and other artifacts together with distinguished keynote spe akers:
\nMonday\, September 11\, 4pm
\nHans Ulrich Gumb
recht: UNFOLDING A FUZZY FUTURE? Dimensions for Thinking about “Singularit
y”
Tuesday\, September 12\, 10am
\n
Cameron Buckner: Understanding Progress in AI Using Empiricist Philosophy
of Mind
\n
Wednesday\, September 13\, 3pm
\n
Wednesday\, September 13\, 5pm
\nDavid Chalmers: Forum Humanum Lecture
\n
Thursday\, September 14\, 4pm
\nNandi Theunissen:
Rethinking Regress Arguments for the Value of Humanity
< /p>\n
Friday\, September 15\, 4pm
\nKalindi Vora
p>\n
Tickets: https://event.newschool.edu/ipnh2023#rsvp.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:metaphysics\,mind X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/ipnh2023#rsvp END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7638@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/661706941882679296/91721-alison-stone DESCRIPTION:The New York German Idealism Workshop is pleased to announce th e first talk of the semester. Alison Stone (Lancaster University) will be giving a talk entitled\, “Bettina von Arnim’s Romantic Philosophy in Die G ünderode” on September 17 from 10am-12pm EST. Giulia Valpione (Università degli Studi di Padova) will be providing comments.\nJoin Zoom Meeting http s://NewSchool.zoom.us/j/93096095303?pwd=ZjVWaTdLZ0VlNTlPUHFuWmJDVE9DZz09\n \nPlease email nygermanidealism@gmail.com to request the paper (and join o ur listserv)\, which has already been distributed (as of 9/8/21). DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20210917T100000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20210917T120000 LOCATION:ZOOM - see site for details SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Alison Stone @ The New York German Idealism Workshop URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/alison-stone-the-new-yor k-german-idealism-workshop/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nThe New York German Idealism Workshop is pleased to announce the first talk of the seme ster. Alison Stone (Lancaster University) will be giving a talk ent itled\, “Bettina von Arnim’s Romantic Philosophy in Die Günderode” on September 17 from 10am-12pm EST. Giulia Valpione ( Università degli Studi di Padova) will be providing comments.
\nJoin Zoom Meeting https://NewSchool.zoom.us/j/93096095303?pwd=ZjVWaTdLZ0VlNTlPUHFuWmJDVE9D Zz09
\n
\nPlease email nygermanidealism@gmail.com to request the pa
per (and join our listserv)\, which has already been distributed (as of 9/
8/21).
The second ta lk of the semester will be by Elisa Magrì (Boston College)\, who wi ll be giving a talk entitled\, “Sedimentation and Ethical Memory in Hegel’ s Philosophy of Spirit.” The talk will take place on October 15 fro m 4:30-6:30pm EST.
\nA Zoom link will be provided in advance. Please stay tuned for a poster containing all the events for the fall sem ester.
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7855@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/694606637032423424/92322-robert-stern DESCRIPTION:We are excited to announce that the first workshop of the semes ter will take place in person on Friday\, September 23rd from *4-6pm* (ple ase note the change in the usual time). Robert Stern (University of Sheffi eld) will be giving a talk entitled\, “Found or Sought? Hegel vs MacIntyre on the Good Life and the Virtues.” Please note that the talk will take pl ace at The New School\, Room M104 (The Bark Room)\, Sheila C. Johnson Desi gn Center (The Sheila C. Johnson Design Center is on the southwest corner of 5th ave and 13th street)\nTo attend the talk in person you will need to be up-to-date with vaccinations and boosters and set up a CLEAR Health Pa ss account in advance. Directions for visitor access are below.\nThe event has been organized by the Wittgenstein Workshop.\nAbstract: This paper dr aws a contrast between Hegel and MacIntyre\, treating both as post-Kantian perfectionists. The claim is that while Hegel treats the good life as som ething found\, and to be implemented in the rational state\, MacIntyre tre ats it as something to be sought. This difference\, it is argued\, is refl ected in their respective accounts of the virtues: for Hegel\, the key vir tue becomes rectitude\, whereas for MacIntyre a wider range of virtues is required\, to make this quest for the good achievable. Using the character s of Walt and Travis from Paris\, Texas to illustrate the argument\, it is suggested that the MacIntyrean option is to be preferred.\nGUEST AND VISI TOR ACCESS AND VACCINATION POLICY\nGuests and visitors must be up-to-date with their COVID-19 vaccinations\, including a booster when eligible.\nBeg inning Monday\, August 15\, The New School will use CLEAR’S Health Pass\, an online tool that safely and simply verifies proof of COVID-19 vaccinati on\, to issue guest passes. The CLEAR Health Pass replaces on-site manual vaccination checking and physical guest passes. CLEAR accounts should be s et up in advance of arrival on campus and will remain active for a month\, requiring only a selfie to reactivate. Details and instructions about cre ating and setting up a CLEAR account can be found on our website.\nThe Wel come Center Visitors Desk will remain open in a limited capacity to suppor t the guests who may not be able to use CLEAR.\nBefore coming to campus\, guests must verify vaccination records with the university.\nIf visitors a re all of the below:\n\n18 years of age or older.\nOr\, are under 18 years of age and visiting campus with someone over 18.\nHave access to a mobile device.\nHave proof of vaccination accepted by CLEAR\nDomestic: Pictures of CDC card and Smart QR Codes\nInternational: EU Digital COVID Certificat ion (DCC) and UK National Health Service (NHS) COVID Pass.\nHave a picture ID with the name matching the name on the vaccination record.\n\nIf visit ors are at least one of the below:\n\nUnder 18 years of age coming alone. \nDo not have access to a mobile device.\nHave proof of vaccination that i s not accepted by CLEAR (e.g.\, other countries than the US\, UK\, EU).\nD o not have a picture ID with the name matching the name on the vaccination record.\nCannot create or use a CLEAR account.\n\nUse CLEAR to verify vac cination records and receive a guest pass in the app. \nWe recommend creat ing and verifying your account in advance of coming to campus. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220923T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220923T180000 GEO:+40.735274;-73.994553 LOCATION:New School M104 (The Bark Room)\, Sheila C. Johnson Design Center @ 66 5th Ave\, New York\, NY 10011\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Found or Sought? Hegel vs MacIntyre on the Good Life and the Virtue s. Robert Stern (U Sheffield) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/found-or-sought-hegel-vs -macintyre-on-the-good-life-and-the-virtues-robert-stern-u-sheffield/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nWe are excite d to announce that the first workshop of the semester will take place i n person on Friday\, September 23rd from *4-6pm* (please note the change in the usual time). Robert Stern (University of Sh effield) will be giving a talk entitled\, “Found or Sought? Hegel vs MacIn tyre on the Good Life and the Virtues.” Please note that the talk will tak e place at The New School\, Room M104 (The Bark Room)\, Sheila C. Johnson Design Center (The Sheila C. Johnson Design Center is on the southwest cor ner of 5th ave and 13th street)
\nTo attend the talk in person you w ill need to be up-to-date with vaccinations and boosters and set up a C LEAR Health Pass account in advance. Directions for visitor access are below.
\nThe event has been organized by the Wittgenstein Worksh op.
\nAbstract: This paper draws a contrast between Hegel and MacIntyre\, treating both as post-Kantian perfectionists. The claim i s that while Hegel treats the good life as something found\, and to be imp lemented in the rational state\, MacIntyre treats it as something to be so ught. This difference\, it is argued\, is reflected in their respective ac counts of the virtues: for Hegel\, the key virtue becomes rectitude\, wher eas for MacIntyre a wider range of virtues is required\, to make this ques t for the good achievable. Using the characters of Walt and Travis from Paris\, Texas to illustrate the argument\, it is suggested that the M acIntyrean option is to be preferred.
\nGuests and visitors must be up-to-date with their COVID-19 vaccinations\, including a booster when eligible.
\nBeginning Monday\, August 15\, The New School will use CLEAR’S Health Pass\, an online tool t hat safely and simply verifies proof of COVID-19 vaccination\, to issue gu est passes. The CLEAR Health Pass replaces on-site manual vaccination c hecking and physical guest passes. CLEAR accounts should be set up in advance of arrival on campus and will remain active for a month\, requirin g only a selfie to reactivate. Details and instructions about creating and setting up a CLEAR account can be found on our websit e.
\nThe Welcome Center Visitors Desk will remain open in a limite d capacity to support the guests who may not be able to use CLEAR.
\nBefore coming to campus\, guests must verify vaccination records with the university.
\nIf visitors are all of th e below:
\nI f visitors are at least one of the below:
\nUse CLEAR to verify vaccination records and receive a guest pass in the app.
\nWe recommend cr eating and verifying your account in advance of coming to campus.
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7964@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U\,New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/708636328395472896/21523-james-kreine s DESCRIPTION:15 Feb\, 4pm:\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)\nFrom Shapeles s Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously \n@ The New School\, Room L502\, at 2 W 13th Street\nGuests and visitors p olicies at the New School can be accessed via this website. You will have to download CLEAR and upload proof of vaccination or the results of a rapi d test. Please try to arrive 15 minutes earlier so we can help you in case of complications.\n\nFeb 24:\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)\nGrounds and Limits o f Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\n@ Columbia\n\nMar 3:\nHeikki Ika heimo\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique\n@ Zoom\n\nMar 24:\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 11:\nKarin de Boer\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason A mount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 15\ , 4pm:\nEva von Redecker\nCo-sponsored by the New School Graduate Student Conference\n@ The New School\n\nApr 21:\nGiulia Battistoni\nNAture\, Life\ , Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in J onas’ Philosophical Biology\n@ The New School\n \n DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230215T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230215T180000 GEO:+40.735225;-73.994325 LOCATION:The New School L502 @ 2 W 13th St\, New York\, NY 10011\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:From Shapeless Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously. James Kreines (Claremont McKenna) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/german-idealism-workshop -3/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\n15 Feb\, 4pm:
\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)
\nFrom Shapeless Abyss To wards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously
\n@ The New School\, Room L502\, at 2 W 13th Street
\nGuests and visito rs policies at the New School can be accessed via this w ebsite. You will have to download CLEAR and upload proof of vaccinatio n or the results of a rapid test. Please try to arrive 15 minutes earlier so we can help you in case of complications.
\nFeb 24:
\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)
\nGrounds and Limits of Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx
\n@ Columbia
\nMar 3:
\nHeik ki Ikaheimo
\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique
\n@ Zoom< /p>\n
Mar 24:
\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)
\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 11:
\nKarin de Boer
\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure R eason Amount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?
\n@ Colum bia
\nApr 15\, 4pm:
\nEva von Redecker
\nCo-spon sored by the New School Graduate Student Conference
\n@ The New Scho ol
\nApr 21:
\nGiulia Battistoni
\nNAture\, Life \, Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in Jonas’ Philosophical Biology
\n@ The New School
\n\n
< /p>\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,Hegel\,idealism\,Spinoza END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7916@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U\,New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/707532268699320320 DESCRIPTION:15 Feb\, 4pm:\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)\nFrom Shapeles s Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously \n@ The New School\n\nFeb 24:\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)\nGrounds and Limits o f Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\n@ Columbia\n\nMar 3:\nHeikki Ika heimo\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique\n@ Zoom\n\nMar 24:\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 11:\nKarin de Boer\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason A mount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 15\ , 4pm:\nEva von Redecker\nCo-sponsored by the New School Graduate Student Conference\n@ The New School\n\nApr 21:\nGiulia Battistoni\nNAture\, Life\ , Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in J onas’ Philosophical Biology\n@ The New School DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230224T163000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230224T183000 EXDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T163000 GEO:+40.712775;-74.005973 LOCATION:New School/Columbia @ New York\, NY\, USA RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230224T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230303T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230324T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230415T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230421T163000 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:German Idealism Workshop URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/german-idealism-workshop -2/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\n15 Feb\, 4pm:
\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)
\nFrom Shapeless Abyss To wards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously
\n@ The New School
\nFeb 24:
\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)
\nGrounds and Limits of Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx
\n@ Columbia
\nMar 3:
\nHeikki Ikaheimo
\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique
\n@ Zoom
\nMar 24:
\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)
\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 11:
\nKarin de Boer
\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason Amount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 15\ , 4pm:
\nEva von Redecker
\nCo-sponsored by the New School Gra duate Student Conference
\n@ The New School
\nApr 21:< /p>\n
Giulia Battistoni
\nNAture\, Life\, Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in Jonas’ Philosophical Biolog y
\n@ The New School
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7992@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U\,New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/712945936965517312/41123-karin-de-boe r DESCRIPTION:15 Feb\, 4pm:\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)\nFrom Shapeles s Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously \n@ The New School\n\nFeb 24:\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)\nGrounds and Limits o f Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\n@ Columbia\n\nMar 3:\nHeikki Ika heimo\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique\n@ Zoom\n\nMar 24:\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 11:\nKarin de Boer\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason A mount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 15\ , 4pm:\nEva von Redecker\nCo-sponsored by the New School Graduate Student Conference\n@ The New School\n\nApr 21:\nGiulia Battistoni\nNAture\, Life\ , Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in J onas’ Philosophical Biology\n@ The New School DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T163000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T183000 GEO:+40.807536;-73.962573 LOCATION:Columbia U Hamilton 602 @ New York\, NY 10027\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Does Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason Amount to an A Priori History o f Rational Cosmology? Karin de Boer (KU Leuven) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/does-kants-antinomy-of-p ure-reason-amount-to-an-a-priori-history-of-rational-cosmology-karin-de-bo er-ku-leuven/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\n15 Feb\, 4pm:
\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)
\nFrom Shapeless Abyss To wards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously
\n@ The New School
\nFeb 24:
\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)
\nGrounds and Limits of Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx
\n@ Columbia
\nMar 3:
\nHeikki Ikaheimo
\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique
\n@ Zoom
\nMar 24:
\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)
\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 11:
\nKarin de Boer
\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason Amount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 15\ , 4pm:
\nEva von Redecker
\nCo-sponsored by the New School Gra duate Student Conference
\n@ The New School
\nApr 21:< /p>\n
Giulia Battistoni
\nNAture\, Life\, Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in Jonas’ Philosophical Biolog y
\n@ The New School
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8046@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/thedialecticofminddesign DESCRIPTION:In this paper\, I explore the role that metaphor plays in the d evelopment of new scientific models. My goal is to illustrate metaphor’s f ecundity in this regard\, the way in which it extends our understanding in surprisingly diverse ways. As Mary Hesse put this point\, “it is precisel y in its extension that the fruitfulness of the model may lie” (1980\, 114 ).\n \nThe particular focus of my paper is on the history of what John Hau geland called mind design: the use of mechanical models to reverse-enginee r how minds work (1997\, 1). My history focuses on two such models: the cl ockwork model and the computer model. In each case\, I show how a metaphor ical understanding of the model led to conceptual innovation in two distin ct ways. First\, it provided an interpretive frame that guided new researc h by offering an abstract\, hypothesized structure to be later filled in b y empirical research (Camp 2020). Second\, it provided a concrete exemplar to contrast with human minds (Daston 1994). For instance\, while on the o ne hand Descartes invoked the clockwork model to explain how color vision works (Adams 2015)\, he also invoked it as a vivid illustration of how hum an reasoning does not work (Riskin 2016).\n \nIt is this second source of conceptual innovation that is the real core of the paper\; it reveals what I call the dialectic of mind design. This dialectic is especially evident in our tendency to redefine what it is to be human in response to new tec hnological developments. For instance\, it is evident when we take somethi ng that was previously assumed to be paradigmatic of mental acuity\, such as the ability to play chess\, and redefine it as something merely mechani cal (Ensmenger 2012). But it is equally well evident when we take somethin g that was previously taken to be mechanical—such as color vision—and rede fine it as paradigmatically mental (Chalmers 1997\; cf. Adams and Browning 2020). The concept of mindedness is\, in this sense\, a constantly moving goalpost that is perennially being redefined in response to new technolog ical developments.\nTickets: https://event.newschool.edu/thedialecticofmin ddesign#rsvp. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230907T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230907T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Philosophy Colloquium: The Dialectic of Mind Design. Zed Adams (NSS R) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/philosophy-colloquium-th e-dialectic-of-mind-design-zed-adams-nssr/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nIn this paper \, I explore the role that metaphor plays in the development of new scient ific models. My goal is to illustrate metaphor’s fecundity in this regard\ , the way in which it extends our understanding in surprisingly diverse wa ys. As Mary Hesse put this point\, “it is precisely in its extension that the fruitfulness of the model may lie” (1980\, 114).
\n\n
The particular focus of my paper is on the history of what John Haugeland cal led mind design: the use of mechanical models to reverse-engineer how mind s work (1997\, 1). My history focuses on two such models: the clockwork mo del and the computer model. In each case\, I show how a metaphorical under standing of the model led to conceptual innovation in two distinct ways. F irst\, it provided an interpretive frame that guided new research by offer ing an abstract\, hypothesized structure to be later filled in by empirica l research (Camp 2020). Second\, it provided a concrete exemplar to contra st with human minds (Daston 1994). For instance\, while on the one hand De scartes invoked the clockwork model to explain how color vision works (Ada ms 2015)\, he also invoked it as a vivid illustration of how human reasoni ng does not work (Riskin 2016).
\n\n
It is this second source of conceptual innovation that is the real core of the paper\; it reveals what I call the dialectic of mind design. This dialectic is especially evi dent in our tendency to redefine what it is to be human in response to new technological developments. For instance\, it is evident when we take som ething that was previously assumed to be paradigmatic of mental acuity\, s uch as the ability to play chess\, and redefine it as something merely mec hanical (Ensmenger 2012). But it is equally well evident when we take some thing that was previously taken to be mechanical—such as color vision—and redefine it as paradigmatically mental (Chalmers 1997\; cf. Adams and Brow ning 2020). The concept of mindedness is\, in this sense\, a constantly mo ving goalpost that is perennially being redefined in response to new techn ological developments.
\nTickets: https: //event.newschool.edu/thedialecticofminddesign#rsvp.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:mind\,science X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/thedialecticofminddesign#rsvp END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8050@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/stefanomicali DESCRIPTION:When is anxiety justified? When does anxiety cease to function as an effective and reasonable signal preventing imminent threats\, and wh en does it become an invasive projection of our own ghosts? My talk is div ided into three sections. First\, I will emphasize the anthropological rel evance of anxiety: in various theoretical frameworks\, the difference betw een free-floating anxiety and fear directed at a specific danger even serv es as a criterion for distinguishing human beings from animals. Second\, I will conduct a phenomenological analysis of anxiety focusing in particula r on the altered relationship between perception and imagination. Third\, I will address a specific form of anxiety which is particularly dominant i n the context of our post-disciplinary societies: the feeling of being lef t behind. My talk presents a philosophical inquiry into the affective phen omenon that can both protect us from danger and be a danger in itself.\n \nBio:\nStefano Micali is a Professor at the KU Leuven and the Coordinator of the Husserl-Archives: Centre for Phenomenology and Continental Philoso phy. He has published over 60 articles in different languages (English\, G erman\, Italian\, French\, and Dutch) in various areas of research ranging from psychopathology to religion\, from political philosophy to aesthetic s. He is the author of four monographic books: Überschüsse der Erfahrung ( 2008)\, Esperienze temporali (2008)\, Tra l’altro e se stessi (2020) and P henomenology of Anxiety (2022). Together with Thomas Fuchs\, he has edited several volumes focusing on the relation between psychopathology and phil osophy. He is also co-editor of the DGAP (German Society for a Phenomenolo gical Anthropology) series and the Phaenomenologica series (Springer).\nTi ckets: https://event.newschool.edu/stefanomicali#rsvp. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230914T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230914T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Anxiety: A Phenomenological Investigation. Stefano Micali (K U Leuv en) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/anxiety-a-phenomenologic al-investigation-stefano-micali-k-u-leuven/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nWhen is anxie ty justified? When does anxiety cease to function as an effective and reas onable signal preventing imminent threats\, and when does it become an inv asive projection of our own ghosts? My talk is divided into three sections . First\, I will emphasize the anthropological relevance of anxiety: in va rious theoretical frameworks\, the difference between free-floating anxiet y and fear directed at a specific danger even serves as a criterion for di stinguishing human beings from animals. Second\, I will conduct a phenomen ological analysis of anxiety focusing in particular on the altered relatio nship between perception and imagination. Third\, I will address a specifi c form of anxiety which is particularly dominant in the context of our pos t-disciplinary societies: the feeling of being left behind. My talk presen ts a philosophical inquiry into the affective phenomenon that can both pro tect us from danger and be a danger in itself.
\n\n
B io:
\nStefano Micali is a Professor at the KU Leuven and th e Coordinator of the Husserl-Archives: Centre for Phenomenology and Contin ental Philosophy. He has published over 60 articles in different languages (English\, German\, Italian\, French\, and Dutch) in various areas of res earch ranging from psychopathology to religion\, from political philosophy to aesthetics. He is the author of four monographic books: Überschüss e der Erfahrung (2008)\, Esperienze temporali (2008)\, T ra l’altro e se stessi (2020) and Phenomenology of Anxiety ( 2022). Together with Thomas Fuchs\, he has edited several volumes focusing on the relation between psychopathology and philosophy. He is also co-edi tor of the DGAP (German Society for a Phenomenological Anthropology) serie s and the Phaenomenologica series (Springer).
\nTickets: https://event.newschool.edu/stefanomicali#rsvp.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:phenomenology X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/stefanomicali#rsvp END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8054@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:cantt897@newschool.edu\; https://event.newschool.edu/theworldaccord ingtokant DESCRIPTION:***In response to numerous requests\, the event will now be str eamed. Link to the stream (via Zoom) and additional details can be found h ere: https://event.newschool.edu/theworldaccordingtokant.***\n\n\nAnja Jau ernig’s recently published The World According to Kant (Oxford\, 2021) def ends an interpretation of Kant’s critical idealism as an ontological posit ion\, according to which Kant can be considered a genuine idealist about e mpirical objects\, empirical minds\, and space time. Yet in contrast to ot her intentional objects\, appearances genuinely exist\, which is why Kant can also be considered a genuine realist about empirical objects\, empiric al minds\, and space and time. This book spells out Kant’s case for critic al idealism thus understood and clarifies Kant’s conception of appearances and things in themselves in relation to Kant’s Leibniz-Wolffian predecess ors.\nAnja Jauernig (NYU)\nBio:\nAnja Jauernig is Professor of Philosophy at New York University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Princeton University\, and held academic positions at the philosophy departments of the Universi ty of Notre Dame and the University of Pittsburgh before coming to NYU. He r research interests include Kant\, Early Modern Philosophy\, 19th and ear ly 20th century German Philosophy\, Aesthetics\, and Animal Ethics.\nPatri cia Kitcher (Columbia)\nBio:\nPatricia Kitcher is Roberta and William Cam pbell Professor Emerita of Humanities and Professor Emerita of Philosophy at Columbia. She has written two books on Kant’s theory of cognition and the self and is editor of the Oxford Philosophical Concepts volume on The Self.\nAndrew Chignell (Princeton)\nBio:\nAndrew Chignell is Laurence S. R ockefeller Professor in Religion\, Philosophy\, and the University Center for Human Values at Princeton. Prior to that he was a Professor of Philos ophy at Penn and Associate and Assistant Professor in the Sage School of P hilosophy at Cornell. His research interests are in early modern philosop hy (especially Kant) and in philosophy of religion\, moral psychology\, ep istemology\, and food ethics. From 2020-2023 he served as President of th e North American Kant Society.\nDesmond Hogan (Princeton)\nBio:\nDesmond H ogan is Professor of Philosophy at Princeton University. He received his P h.D. from Yale University. His research interests include metaphysics\, ph ilosophy of science\, ethics\, and aesthetics\, with a focus on the modern period and nineteenth century. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231005T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231005T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:The World According to Kant\, (Anja Jauernig) Book Symposium URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/the-world-according-to-k ant-book-symposium/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nAnja Jauernig’s recently published The World According to Kant (Oxford \, 2021) defends an interpretation of Kant’s critical idealism as an ontol ogical position\, according to which Kant can be considered a genuine idea list about empirical objects\, empirical minds\, and space time. Yet in co ntrast to other intentional objects\, appearances genuinely exist\, which is why Kant can also be considered a genuine realist about empirical objec ts\, empirical minds\, and space and time. This book spells out Kant’s cas e for critical idealism thus understood and clarifies Kant’s conception of appearances and things in themselves in relation to Kant’s Leibniz-Wolffi an predecessors.
\nAnja Jauernig (NYU)
\nBio:
\nAnja Jauernig is Professor of Philosoph y at New York University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Princeton University \, and held academic positions at the philosophy departments of the Univer sity of Notre Dame and the University of Pittsburgh before coming to NYU. Her research interests include Kant\, Early Modern Philosophy\, 19th and e arly 20th century German Philosophy\, Aesthetics\, and Animal Ethics.
\nPatricia Kitcher (Columbia)
\nBio:
\nPatricia Kitcher is Roberta and William Campbell Professor Emerita of Humanities and Professor Emerita of Philosophy at Columbia. Sh e has written two books on Kant’s theory of cognition and the self and is editor of the Oxford Philosophical Concepts volume on The Self.
\nAndrew Chignell (Princeton)
Bio: p>\n
Andrew Chignell is Laurence S. Rockefeller Professor in Religion\, Philosophy\, and the University Center for Human Values at Princeton. Pri or to that he was a Professor of Philosophy at Penn and Associate and Assi stant Professor in the Sage School of Philosophy at Cornell. His research interests are in early modern philosophy (especially Kant) and in philoso phy of religion\, moral psychology\, epistemology\, and food ethics. From 2020-2023 he served as President of the North American Kant Society.
\nDesmond Hogan (Princeton)
\nBio:
\nDesmond Hogan is Professor of Philosophy at Princeton Universi ty. He received his Ph.D. from Yale University. His research interests inc lude metaphysics\, philosophy of science\, ethics\, and aesthetics\, with a focus on the modern period and nineteenth century.
\nPresented by the New York German Idealism Workshop
\nPerfection and Morality: Kan t’s Critique of the Stoics. Stephen Engstrom. With response from Francey R ussell. @Columbia 22 September
\nHegel’s Theory of Absolute Spirit. Markus Grante. With response from Amelle Djemel. @New School 6 October
\nThe Argument of Kant’s Groundwork. Pauline Kleingeld. With r esponse by Patricia Kitcher. @Columbia 27 October
\nNathan DuFord tb d. With response by Chris O’Kane. @New School 10 November
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8074@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:nycwittgensteinworkshop@gmail.com DESCRIPTION:The virtually ubiquitous view of seeing-as experiences in Wittg enstein scholarship interprets them as conceptually-laden (with some excep tions\, e.g. Travis 2016). The claim is that we can see the same image dif ferently due to switching the conceptual filters\, as it were\, through wh ich we experience the image (e.g. Schroeder 2010\; Mulhall 2001). In this paper I focus on a specific kind of a seeing-as experience for which Wittg enstein’s example of suddenly noticing the similarity between faces is the paradigm. I argue that it is possible to have no concepts involved in thi s experience\, and propose an understanding of what I call “the imagistic seeing-as” as a similarity association\, of the kind that grounds poetic m eans of expression\, such as metaphors. The associative nature of this ima gistic seeing-as experience may also contribute to the understanding of bi ases – both personal (e.g. displaced offence) and social (e.g. sexism). DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231013T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231013T180000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Room 1101 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:An Imagistic Seeing-As: from Faces to Metaphors and Biases. Talia M orag (U Wollongong) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/an-imagistic-seeing-as-f rom-faces-to-metaphors-and-biases-talia-morag-u-wollongong/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nThe virtually ubiquitous view of seeing-as experiences in Wittgenstein scholarship inte rprets them as conceptually-laden (with some exceptions\, e.g. Travis 2016 ). The claim is that we can see the same image differently due to switchin g the conceptual filters\, as it were\, through which we experience the im age (e.g. Schroeder 2010\; Mulhall 2001). In this paper I focus on a speci fic kind of a seeing-as experience for which Wittgenstein’s example of sud denly noticing the similarity between faces is the paradigm. I argue that it is possible to have no concepts involved in this experience\, and propo se an understanding of what I call “the imagistic seeing-as” as a similari ty association\, of the kind that grounds poetic means of expression\, suc h as metaphors. The associative nature of this imagistic seeing-as experie nce may also contribute to the understanding of biases – both personal (e. g. displaced offence) and social (e.g. sexism).
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:language\,phenomenology\,wittgenstein END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8059@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/ DESCRIPTION:Presented by the New York German Idealism Workshop\nPerfection and Morality: Kant’s Critique of the Stoics. Stephen Engstrom. With respon se from Francey Russell. @Columbia 22 September\nHegel’s Theory of Absolut e Spirit. Markus Grante. With response from Amelle Djemel. @New School 6 O ctober\nThe Argument of Kant’s Groundwork. Pauline Kleingeld. With respons e by Patricia Kitcher. @Columbia 27 October\nNathan DuFord tbd. With respo nse by Chris O’Kane. @New School 10 November DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231110T163000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231110T183000 GEO:+40.736998;-73.992251 LOCATION:New School tbd @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Nathan DuFord URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/nathan-duford/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nPresented by the New York German Idealism Workshop
\nPerfection and Morality: Kan t’s Critique of the Stoics. Stephen Engstrom. With response from Francey R ussell. @Columbia 22 September
\nHegel’s Theory of Absolute Spirit. Markus Grante. With response from Amelle Djemel. @New School 6 October
\nThe Argument of Kant’s Groundwork. Pauline Kleingeld. With r esponse by Patricia Kitcher. @Columbia 27 October
\nNathan DuFord tb d. With response by Chris O’Kane. @New School 10 November
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8142@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240328T180314Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/sophieloidolt DESCRIPTION:What does it mean to be\, appear\, and act in public? These que stions are rarely asked when it comes to the often-diagnosed “structural t ransformation” (Habermas) of the public sphere. Yet people have a wide var iety of “public experiences” every day: from the simple experience of leav ing the house and moving on the street to highly networked and technologic ally mediated public communication and concerted action. In the project I would like to present in its outlines\, I try to shed light on the quality and structure of such “public experiences” using a phenomenological appro ach. In this way\, I want to reclaim public space as an experiential space and argue that experiences matter for the constitution of different kinds of public spheres and public spaces.\nHow\, for example\, do phenomena li ke visibility\, attention\, relevance\, reality\, trust\, or their opposit es emerge in public contexts? And how can our individual and collective ex periences of the public retain its high democratic ideals while facing the constant threat of superficial entertainment and self-commercialization? In contrast to theories that view the public sphere primarily as a system of information\, coordination\, or discourse\, a phenomenological approach aims to reveal the ways in which experiences constitute spaces of meaning . Such a disclosure of the world-building function of experience is crucia l if we are to understand how people can relate to their public existence and a public world\, how they can integrate into it or fall away from it\, gain or lose trust\, and how a shared world is either built or destroyed. \n \n Bio:\nSophie Loidolt is Professor of philosophy and Chair of Practic al Philosophy at the Technical University of Darmstadt\, Germany. She is a recurrent visiting professor at Center for Subjectivity Research in Copen hagen and the president of the German Society for Phenomenological Researc h. Most of her education took place at the University of Vienna. Research stays brought her to the Husserl-Archives in Leuven\, St. Denis University in Paris\, and the New School of Social Research in New York.\nHer work c enters on issues in the fields of phenomenology\, political and legal phil osophy\, and ethics\, as well as transcendental philosophy and philosophy of mind. Her book Phenomenology of Plurality. Hannah Arendt on Political I ntersubjectivity (Routledge 2017) won the Edward Goodwin Ballard Book Priz e in 2018. Other books include: Anspruch und Rechtfertigung. Eine Theorie des rechtlichen Denkens im Anschluss an die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls (Springer 2009)\, Einführung in die Rechtsphänomenologie (Mohr Siebeck 20 10\; Japanese translation will appear in 2024).\nTickets: https://event.ne wschool.edu/sophieloidolt. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240411T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240411T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:On Being\, Appearing\, and Acting in Public. Towards a Phenomenolog ical Theory of the Public Realm – presented by Sophie Loidolt URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/on-being-appearing-and-a cting-in-public-towards-a-phenomenological-theory-of-the-public-realm-pres ented-by-sophie-loidolt/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nWhat does it mean to be\, appear\, and act in public? These questions are rarely asked when it comes to the often-diagnosed “structural transformation” (Habermas ) of the public sphere. Yet people have a wide variety of “public experien ces” every day: from the simple experience of leaving the house and moving on the street to highly networked and technologically mediated public com munication and concerted action. In the project I would like to present in its outlines\, I try to shed light on the quality and structure of such “ public experiences” using a phenomenological approach. In this way\, I wan t to reclaim public space as an experiential space and argue that experien ces matter for the constitution of different kinds of public spheres and p ublic spaces.
\nHow\, for example\, do phenomena like visibility\, a ttention\, relevance\, reality\, trust\, or their opposites emerge in publ ic contexts? And how can our individual and collective experiences of the public retain its high democratic ideals while facing the constant threat of superficial entertainment and self-commercialization? In contrast to th eories that view the public sphere primarily as a system of information\, coordination\, or discourse\, a phenomenological approach aims to reveal t he ways in which experiences constitute spaces of meaning. Such a disclosu re of the world-building function of experience is crucial if we are to un derstand how people can relate to their public existence and a public worl d\, how they can integrate into it or fall away from it\, gain or lose tru st\, and how a shared world is either built or destroyed.
\n\n< p> Bio:\n
Sophie Loidolt is Professor of philosophy and Chair of Practical Philosophy at the Technical University of Darmstad t\, Germany. She is a recurrent visiting professor at Center for Subjectiv ity Research in Copenhagen and the president of the German Society for Phe nomenological Research. Most of her education took place at the University of Vienna. Research stays brought her to the Husserl-Archives in Leuven\, St. Denis University in Paris\, and the New School of Social Research in New York.
\nHer work centers on issues in the fields of phenomenolog y\, political and legal philosophy\, and ethics\, as well as transcendenta l philosophy and philosophy of mind. Her book Phenomenology of Plurali ty. Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity (Routledge 2017) won the Edward Goodwin Ballard Book Prize in 2018. Other books include: A nspruch und Rechtfertigung. Eine Theorie des rechtlichen Denkens im Anschl uss an die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls (Springer 2009)\, Einfü hrung in die Rechtsphänomenologie (Mohr Siebeck 2010\; Japanese trans lation will appear in 2024).
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:phenomenology\,public X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/sophieloidolt END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR