BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//208.94.116.123//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7725@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Rutgers CONTACT:http://susannaschellenberg.org/special-pages/rutgers-epistemology-c onference/ DESCRIPTION:The REC is a pre-read conference. The papers will be made avail able on this website on April 15.\n\n\n\nPROGRAM\n\nFriday\, April 29\, 20 22\n\n1:30 – 3:15 pm\n\nJeremy Fantl (Calgary)\n\nChair: TBD\n\n\n\n\nCoff ee Break\n3:45 – 5:30 pm\n\nThomas Kelly (Princeton)\n\nChair: TBD\n\n\n\n \nDinner\n7:30 – 9:15 pm\n\nJane Friedman (NYU)\n\nChair: TBD\n\n\n\n\nRec eption 9:30 – 11:00 PM\n\n \nSaturday\, April 30\, 2022\n\n9:30 – 11:15 am \n\nPeter Graham (UCR)\n\nChair: TBD\n\n\n\n\nCoffee Break\n11:45 – 1:30 p m Winner of the Young Epistemologist Prize\n\nMona Simion (Glasgow)\n \nChair: TBD\n\n\n\n\nLunch\n2:45 – 4:30 pm\n\nKathrin Glüer (Stockholms U niversitet) and Asa Wikforss (Stockholms Universitet)\n\nChair: TBD\n\n\n \n\n\nDiscussants\n\nPatrick Greenough (University of St. Andrews)\nSarah Paul (NYU-Abu Dhabi)\nDeclan Smithies (OSU)\nJulia Staffel (University of Colorado)\n\n \nParticipants (to be updated soon)\n\nChris Copan\, Andy Eg an\, Megan Feeney\, Peter Klein\, Matthew McGrath\, Susanna Schellenberg\, Ernie Sosa\n \nThe REC is a pre-read conference\, so papers are to be rea d in advance. There is no registration fee for the conference\, but please notify Chris Copan\, the conference manager\, if you plan to attend by se nding an email to rutgersepistemologyconference@gmail.com. If you wish to participate in the meals\, please send a check made out to “Rutgers Univer sity” to the conference manager by April 15 ($80 if you are a faculty memb er or a postdoc\; $60 if you are a graduate student or an undergraduate): Chris Copan\; REC\; 106 Somerset St\, 5th Floor\; New Brunswick\, NJ 08901 .\n DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20220429 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20220501 GEO:+40.49633;-74.441176 LOCATION:Hyatt Regency New Brunswick @ 2 Albany St\, New Brunswick\, NJ 089 01\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Rutgers Epistemology Conference 2022 URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/rutgers-epistemology-con ference-2022/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\nThe REC is a pre-r ead conference. The papers will be made available on this website on April 15.
\n\n
Saturday\, April 30\, 2022
\nDiscussants
\n\n
Partic
ipants (to be updated soon)
\n
Chris Copan\, Andy Eg an\, Megan Feeney\, Peter Klein\, Matthew McGrath\, Susanna Schellenberg\, Ernie Sosa
\n\n
The REC is a pre-read conference\, so papers are to be read in advance. There is no registration fee for the conferenc e\, but please notify Chris Copan\, the conference manager\, if you plan t o attend by sending an email to rutgersepistemologyconference@gmail.com. If you wish to participate in the meals\, please send a check made out to “Rutgers Unive rsity” to the conference manager by April 15 ($80 if you are a faculty mem ber or a postdoc\; $60 if you are a graduate student or an undergraduate): Chris Copan\; REC\; 106 Somerset St\, 5th Floor\; New Brunswick\, NJ 0890 1.
\n\n
Contact Toby Bollig
\nTBA
\nLocation TBD
The Center fo r Philosophy of Religion at Rutgers University is pleased to host an in-pe rson\, working-papers conference on the Psychology and Epistemology of Rel igious Experience. We are seeking abstracts (150-350 words) from those int erested in participating. The tentative date is 15-16 April 2023. And the deadline for submission is 28 February 2023. Participants with accepted su bmissions will be given hotel accommodations and a modest honorarium to he lp defray travel costs.
\nTheme
\nThe overall theme of the workshop is the Psychology and Epistemology of Religious Experiences. Philosophers of religion frequently assign religious experiences important epistemic roles\, such as justifying religious beliefs. But religious exp eriences of the kind philosophers are interested in are also studied in ot her fields as well\, such as psychology and religious studies. However\, t he psychology and epistemology of religious experiences are presumably not independent\; studying them together is likely to be insightful in variou s ways. To that end\, we are interested in bringing together scholars work ing on the psychology and epistemology of religious experiences. Potential topics include:
\n· The nature of religious experiences
\n· Taxonomies of religious experiences
\n· Potential p sychological mechanisms and accounts of religious experience
\n· The relation between perception and religious experiences
\n· The epistemology of religious experience
\n· The interactio ns between the psychology and epistemology of religious experience
\n· The relation of cognitive science of religion to religious experi ence
\nAny proposed papers on these topics\, or similar ones\, are w elcome. Papers exploring interdisciplinary approaches are also welcome.
\nInstructions
\nPlease submit an abstract (150-350 words )\, long abstract (350-650 words)\, or full paper to Timothy Perrine at tp654@scarletm ail.rutgers.edu. Submission should be prepared for blind review. In a separate document please provide your name\, institutional affiliation (if applicable)\, and contact information. Submission deadline is 28 February \; acceptances will be decided by 5 March\; and the workshop will be held 15-16 April.
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:cfa\,conference\,epistemology\,mind\,religion END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7935@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Rutgers CONTACT:https://philosophy.rutgers.edu/events/department-calendar/icalrepea t.detail/2023/04/04/749/-/rutgers-epistemology-conference DESCRIPTION:Rutgers Epistemology Conference DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20230503 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20230505 GEO:+40.49747;-74.44717 LOCATION:Seminar Room 524B @ The Gateway\, 106 Somerset St\, New Brunswick\ , NJ 08901\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Rutgers Epistemology Conference URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/rutgers-epistemology-con ference-3/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nHow does objectivity shape power\, and how does power shape ob jectivity?
\nWelcome to “Unmasking Objectivity: A Critical Examinati on of the Nexus between Universal Truth Claims and Emergent Power Structur es\,” a conference that plunges into the intricate relationship between kn owledge and power. In this conference\, we will uncover how epistemologica l standpoints intersect with systems of coercion\, marginalization\, and o ppression. Our topic extends to alternative visions of knowledge\, truth\, and learning\, offering the potential for shared beliefs while addressing the adverse impacts of entrenched power structures.
\nHow have clai ms to absolute\, objective\, or scientific truth driven oppression through ideologies like religious absolutism\, colonialism\, technocracy\, and sc ientific sexism and racism? Contemporary debates further emphasize the sig nificance of this intersection.
\nOur discourse will also scrutinize epistemic injustice\, examining whether universalist epistemologies privi lege specific knowledge systems while silencing valid alternatives. We aim to shed light on social and political issues overlooked by dominant knowl edge frameworks through inclusive dialogues. This conference fosters criti cal exploration and inclusive discourse\, drawing on interdisciplinary stu dies in philosophy\, sociology\, and political theory.
\nTogether\, we will assess the ethical implications of our epistemological practices a nd explore pathways to creating more equitable systems of knowledge and so cial learning. Join us at “Unmasking Objectivity” as we navigate the intri cate web of knowledge and power\, aiming for a just and inclusive future w here the notion of objectivity is both scrutinized and harnessed for socia l transformation.
\n\n\n\n\nThe Rutgers Epistemology Conference is a pre-read conference. The papers\, the finalized schedule\, and further information about the confer ence will be posted soon.
\nThere is no registration fee for the conference\, but please notify Ca roline von Klemperer\, the conference manager\, if you plan to attend by s ending an email to rutgersepistemologyconference@gmail.com a>. If you wish to participate in the meals\, please send a check made out to “Rutgers University” to Caroline von Klemperer by April 15 ($80 if you are a faculty member or a postdoc\; $60 if you are a graduate student or an undergraduate). Checks should be sent to Caroline von Klemperer\; Rutge rs Epistemology Conference\; 106 Somerset St\, 5th Floor\; New Brunswick\, NJ 08901. Everyone signed up for conference meals by April 15 will be lis ted as a participant on the conference website.
\n\n
https:// philevents.org/event/show/112086
\nAll sessions will be held at the Hyatt Regency in New Brunswick\, NJ . A limited number of reduced-priced rooms are available to those attendin g the conference. The reduced rate is $170 per night for a single or doubl e room. You can reserve a room here: https://www.hyatt.com/en-US/group-boo king/EWRRN/G-RE01.
\nIf you are a graduate stud ent or a postdoc and would like to attend the conference and stay with a R utgers graduate student\, please contact the conference manager at rutgersepistemologyconference@gmail.com. We will try to provide all graduate students and postdocs a place to stay\, but we cannot make a ny promises.
\nInformation about accessibility of the conference venue can be fo und here.
\nPlane & T rain: If you are flying\, it is best to fly into Newark Airport. It is about 25 miles from the Hyatt Regency in New Brunswick. The best way to get from the airport to New Brunswick is via NJ Transit. The train sto ps at the airport and it is a 25 min train ride from the airport to New Br unswick. When you arrive at Newark Airport\, follow the signs to the monor ail “airtrain”. The airtrain will take you to the NJ transit train stop. T rains run from Newark Airport to New Brunswick about every half hour. A on eway ticket Newark Airport – New Brunswick is about $14. You can buy ticke ts at the vending machines at the Newark Airport train station or on the m obile app MyTix. The Hyatt is a 5 min walk from the New Brunswick train st ation.
\nTrain: The best way t o get to New Brunswick from New York or Philadelphia is via NJ Transit. Th e Hyatt is a 5 min walk from the New Brunswick train station.
\nThe New York German Idealism Workshop is pleased to announce the first talk of the seme ster. Alison Stone (Lancaster University) will be giving a talk ent itled\, “Bettina von Arnim’s Romantic Philosophy in Die Günderode” on September 17 from 10am-12pm EST. Giulia Valpione ( Università degli Studi di Padova) will be providing comments.
\nJoin Zoom Meeting https://NewSchool.zoom.us/j/93096095303?pwd=ZjVWaTdLZ0VlNTlPUHFuWmJDVE9D Zz09
\n
\nPlease email nygermanidealism@gmail.com to request the pa
per (and join our listserv)\, which has already been distributed (as of 9/
8/21).
The second ta lk of the semester will be by Elisa Magrì (Boston College)\, who wi ll be giving a talk entitled\, “Sedimentation and Ethical Memory in Hegel’ s Philosophy of Spirit.” The talk will take place on October 15 fro m 4:30-6:30pm EST.
\nA Zoom link will be provided in advance. Please stay tuned for a poster containing all the events for the fall sem ester.
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7855@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/694606637032423424/92322-robert-stern DESCRIPTION:We are excited to announce that the first workshop of the semes ter will take place in person on Friday\, September 23rd from *4-6pm* (ple ase note the change in the usual time). Robert Stern (University of Sheffi eld) will be giving a talk entitled\, “Found or Sought? Hegel vs MacIntyre on the Good Life and the Virtues.” Please note that the talk will take pl ace at The New School\, Room M104 (The Bark Room)\, Sheila C. Johnson Desi gn Center (The Sheila C. Johnson Design Center is on the southwest corner of 5th ave and 13th street)\nTo attend the talk in person you will need to be up-to-date with vaccinations and boosters and set up a CLEAR Health Pa ss account in advance. Directions for visitor access are below.\nThe event has been organized by the Wittgenstein Workshop.\nAbstract: This paper dr aws a contrast between Hegel and MacIntyre\, treating both as post-Kantian perfectionists. The claim is that while Hegel treats the good life as som ething found\, and to be implemented in the rational state\, MacIntyre tre ats it as something to be sought. This difference\, it is argued\, is refl ected in their respective accounts of the virtues: for Hegel\, the key vir tue becomes rectitude\, whereas for MacIntyre a wider range of virtues is required\, to make this quest for the good achievable. Using the character s of Walt and Travis from Paris\, Texas to illustrate the argument\, it is suggested that the MacIntyrean option is to be preferred.\nGUEST AND VISI TOR ACCESS AND VACCINATION POLICY\nGuests and visitors must be up-to-date with their COVID-19 vaccinations\, including a booster when eligible.\nBeg inning Monday\, August 15\, The New School will use CLEAR’S Health Pass\, an online tool that safely and simply verifies proof of COVID-19 vaccinati on\, to issue guest passes. The CLEAR Health Pass replaces on-site manual vaccination checking and physical guest passes. CLEAR accounts should be s et up in advance of arrival on campus and will remain active for a month\, requiring only a selfie to reactivate. Details and instructions about cre ating and setting up a CLEAR account can be found on our website.\nThe Wel come Center Visitors Desk will remain open in a limited capacity to suppor t the guests who may not be able to use CLEAR.\nBefore coming to campus\, guests must verify vaccination records with the university.\nIf visitors a re all of the below:\n\n18 years of age or older.\nOr\, are under 18 years of age and visiting campus with someone over 18.\nHave access to a mobile device.\nHave proof of vaccination accepted by CLEAR\nDomestic: Pictures of CDC card and Smart QR Codes\nInternational: EU Digital COVID Certificat ion (DCC) and UK National Health Service (NHS) COVID Pass.\nHave a picture ID with the name matching the name on the vaccination record.\n\nIf visit ors are at least one of the below:\n\nUnder 18 years of age coming alone. \nDo not have access to a mobile device.\nHave proof of vaccination that i s not accepted by CLEAR (e.g.\, other countries than the US\, UK\, EU).\nD o not have a picture ID with the name matching the name on the vaccination record.\nCannot create or use a CLEAR account.\n\nUse CLEAR to verify vac cination records and receive a guest pass in the app. \nWe recommend creat ing and verifying your account in advance of coming to campus. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20220923T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20220923T180000 GEO:+40.735274;-73.994553 LOCATION:New School M104 (The Bark Room)\, Sheila C. Johnson Design Center @ 66 5th Ave\, New York\, NY 10011\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Found or Sought? Hegel vs MacIntyre on the Good Life and the Virtue s. Robert Stern (U Sheffield) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/found-or-sought-hegel-vs -macintyre-on-the-good-life-and-the-virtues-robert-stern-u-sheffield/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nWe are excite d to announce that the first workshop of the semester will take place i n person on Friday\, September 23rd from *4-6pm* (please note the change in the usual time). Robert Stern (University of Sh effield) will be giving a talk entitled\, “Found or Sought? Hegel vs MacIn tyre on the Good Life and the Virtues.” Please note that the talk will tak e place at The New School\, Room M104 (The Bark Room)\, Sheila C. Johnson Design Center (The Sheila C. Johnson Design Center is on the southwest cor ner of 5th ave and 13th street)
\nTo attend the talk in person you w ill need to be up-to-date with vaccinations and boosters and set up a C LEAR Health Pass account in advance. Directions for visitor access are below.
\nThe event has been organized by the Wittgenstein Worksh op.
\nAbstract: This paper draws a contrast between Hegel and MacIntyre\, treating both as post-Kantian perfectionists. The claim i s that while Hegel treats the good life as something found\, and to be imp lemented in the rational state\, MacIntyre treats it as something to be so ught. This difference\, it is argued\, is reflected in their respective ac counts of the virtues: for Hegel\, the key virtue becomes rectitude\, wher eas for MacIntyre a wider range of virtues is required\, to make this ques t for the good achievable. Using the characters of Walt and Travis from Paris\, Texas to illustrate the argument\, it is suggested that the M acIntyrean option is to be preferred.
\nGuests and visitors must be up-to-date with their COVID-19 vaccinations\, including a booster when eligible.
\nBeginning Monday\, August 15\, The New School will use CLEAR’S Health Pass\, an online tool t hat safely and simply verifies proof of COVID-19 vaccination\, to issue gu est passes. The CLEAR Health Pass replaces on-site manual vaccination c hecking and physical guest passes. CLEAR accounts should be set up in advance of arrival on campus and will remain active for a month\, requirin g only a selfie to reactivate. Details and instructions about creating and setting up a CLEAR account can be found on our websit e.
\nThe Welcome Center Visitors Desk will remain open in a limite d capacity to support the guests who may not be able to use CLEAR.
\nBefore coming to campus\, guests must verify vaccination records with the university.
\nIf visitors are all of th e below:
\nI f visitors are at least one of the below:
\nUse CLEAR to verify vaccination records and receive a guest pass in the app.
\nWe recommend cr eating and verifying your account in advance of coming to campus.
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7964@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U\,New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/708636328395472896/21523-james-kreine s DESCRIPTION:15 Feb\, 4pm:\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)\nFrom Shapeles s Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously \n@ The New School\, Room L502\, at 2 W 13th Street\nGuests and visitors p olicies at the New School can be accessed via this website. You will have to download CLEAR and upload proof of vaccination or the results of a rapi d test. Please try to arrive 15 minutes earlier so we can help you in case of complications.\n\nFeb 24:\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)\nGrounds and Limits o f Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\n@ Columbia\n\nMar 3:\nHeikki Ika heimo\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique\n@ Zoom\n\nMar 24:\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 11:\nKarin de Boer\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason A mount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 15\ , 4pm:\nEva von Redecker\nCo-sponsored by the New School Graduate Student Conference\n@ The New School\n\nApr 21:\nGiulia Battistoni\nNAture\, Life\ , Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in J onas’ Philosophical Biology\n@ The New School\n \n DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230215T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230215T180000 GEO:+40.735225;-73.994325 LOCATION:The New School L502 @ 2 W 13th St\, New York\, NY 10011\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:From Shapeless Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously. James Kreines (Claremont McKenna) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/german-idealism-workshop -3/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\n15 Feb\, 4pm:
\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)
\nFrom Shapeless Abyss To wards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously
\n@ The New School\, Room L502\, at 2 W 13th Street
\nGuests and visito rs policies at the New School can be accessed via this w ebsite. You will have to download CLEAR and upload proof of vaccinatio n or the results of a rapid test. Please try to arrive 15 minutes earlier so we can help you in case of complications.
\nFeb 24:
\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)
\nGrounds and Limits of Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx
\n@ Columbia
\nMar 3:
\nHeik ki Ikaheimo
\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique
\n@ Zoom< /p>\n
Mar 24:
\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)
\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 11:
\nKarin de Boer
\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure R eason Amount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?
\n@ Colum bia
\nApr 15\, 4pm:
\nEva von Redecker
\nCo-spon sored by the New School Graduate Student Conference
\n@ The New Scho ol
\nApr 21:
\nGiulia Battistoni
\nNAture\, Life \, Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in Jonas’ Philosophical Biology
\n@ The New School
\n\n
< /p>\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,Hegel\,idealism\,Spinoza END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7916@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U\,New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/707532268699320320 DESCRIPTION:15 Feb\, 4pm:\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)\nFrom Shapeles s Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously \n@ The New School\n\nFeb 24:\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)\nGrounds and Limits o f Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\n@ Columbia\n\nMar 3:\nHeikki Ika heimo\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique\n@ Zoom\n\nMar 24:\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 11:\nKarin de Boer\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason A mount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 15\ , 4pm:\nEva von Redecker\nCo-sponsored by the New School Graduate Student Conference\n@ The New School\n\nApr 21:\nGiulia Battistoni\nNAture\, Life\ , Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in J onas’ Philosophical Biology\n@ The New School DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230224T163000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230224T183000 EXDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T163000 GEO:+40.712775;-74.005973 LOCATION:New School/Columbia @ New York\, NY\, USA RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230224T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230303T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230324T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230415T163000 RDATE;TZID=America/New_York:20230421T163000 SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:German Idealism Workshop URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/german-idealism-workshop -2/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\n15 Feb\, 4pm:
\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)
\nFrom Shapeless Abyss To wards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously
\n@ The New School
\nFeb 24:
\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)
\nGrounds and Limits of Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx
\n@ Columbia
\nMar 3:
\nHeikki Ikaheimo
\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique
\n@ Zoom
\nMar 24:
\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)
\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 11:
\nKarin de Boer
\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason Amount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 15\ , 4pm:
\nEva von Redecker
\nCo-sponsored by the New School Gra duate Student Conference
\n@ The New School
\nApr 21:< /p>\n
Giulia Battistoni
\nNAture\, Life\, Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in Jonas’ Philosophical Biolog y
\n@ The New School
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7992@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:Columbia U\,New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/post/712945936965517312/41123-karin-de-boe r DESCRIPTION:15 Feb\, 4pm:\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)\nFrom Shapeles s Abyss Towards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously \n@ The New School\n\nFeb 24:\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)\nGrounds and Limits o f Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx\n@ Columbia\n\nMar 3:\nHeikki Ika heimo\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique\n@ Zoom\n\nMar 24:\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 11:\nKarin de Boer\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason A mount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?\n@ Columbia\n\nApr 15\ , 4pm:\nEva von Redecker\nCo-sponsored by the New School Graduate Student Conference\n@ The New School\n\nApr 21:\nGiulia Battistoni\nNAture\, Life\ , Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in J onas’ Philosophical Biology\n@ The New School DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T163000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230411T183000 GEO:+40.807536;-73.962573 LOCATION:Columbia U Hamilton 602 @ New York\, NY 10027\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Does Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason Amount to an A Priori History o f Rational Cosmology? Karin de Boer (KU Leuven) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/does-kants-antinomy-of-p ure-reason-amount-to-an-a-priori-history-of-rational-cosmology-karin-de-bo er-ku-leuven/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\n15 Feb\, 4pm:
\nJames Kreines (Claremont McKenna)
\nFrom Shapeless Abyss To wards Self-Developing Thought: Taking Hegel on Spinoza Seriously
\n@ The New School
\nFeb 24:
\nGeorg Spoo (Freiburg)
\nGrounds and Limits of Immanent Critique: Kant\, Hegel\, Marx
\n@ Columbia
\nMar 3:
\nHeikki Ikaheimo
\nHegel\, Humanity\, and Social Critique
\n@ Zoom
\nMar 24:
\nStephen Howard (KU Leuven)
\nKant’s Late Philosophy of Nature: The Opus Postumum
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 11:
\nKarin de Boer
\nDoes Kant’s Antinomy of Pure Reason Amount to an A Priori History of Rational Cosmology?
\n@ Columbia
\nApr 15\ , 4pm:
\nEva von Redecker
\nCo-sponsored by the New School Gra duate Student Conference
\n@ The New School
\nApr 21:< /p>\n
Giulia Battistoni
\nNAture\, Life\, Organizm: The Legacy of Romanticism and Classical German Philosophy in Jonas’ Philosophical Biolog y
\n@ The New School
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8054@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:cantt897@newschool.edu\; https://event.newschool.edu/theworldaccord ingtokant DESCRIPTION:***In response to numerous requests\, the event will now be str eamed. Link to the stream (via Zoom) and additional details can be found h ere: https://event.newschool.edu/theworldaccordingtokant.***\n\n\nAnja Jau ernig’s recently published The World According to Kant (Oxford\, 2021) def ends an interpretation of Kant’s critical idealism as an ontological posit ion\, according to which Kant can be considered a genuine idealist about e mpirical objects\, empirical minds\, and space time. Yet in contrast to ot her intentional objects\, appearances genuinely exist\, which is why Kant can also be considered a genuine realist about empirical objects\, empiric al minds\, and space and time. This book spells out Kant’s case for critic al idealism thus understood and clarifies Kant’s conception of appearances and things in themselves in relation to Kant’s Leibniz-Wolffian predecess ors.\nAnja Jauernig (NYU)\nBio:\nAnja Jauernig is Professor of Philosophy at New York University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Princeton University\, and held academic positions at the philosophy departments of the Universi ty of Notre Dame and the University of Pittsburgh before coming to NYU. He r research interests include Kant\, Early Modern Philosophy\, 19th and ear ly 20th century German Philosophy\, Aesthetics\, and Animal Ethics.\nPatri cia Kitcher (Columbia)\nBio:\nPatricia Kitcher is Roberta and William Cam pbell Professor Emerita of Humanities and Professor Emerita of Philosophy at Columbia. She has written two books on Kant’s theory of cognition and the self and is editor of the Oxford Philosophical Concepts volume on The Self.\nAndrew Chignell (Princeton)\nBio:\nAndrew Chignell is Laurence S. R ockefeller Professor in Religion\, Philosophy\, and the University Center for Human Values at Princeton. Prior to that he was a Professor of Philos ophy at Penn and Associate and Assistant Professor in the Sage School of P hilosophy at Cornell. His research interests are in early modern philosop hy (especially Kant) and in philosophy of religion\, moral psychology\, ep istemology\, and food ethics. From 2020-2023 he served as President of th e North American Kant Society.\nDesmond Hogan (Princeton)\nBio:\nDesmond H ogan is Professor of Philosophy at Princeton University. He received his P h.D. from Yale University. His research interests include metaphysics\, ph ilosophy of science\, ethics\, and aesthetics\, with a focus on the modern period and nineteenth century. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231005T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231005T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:The World According to Kant\, (Anja Jauernig) Book Symposium URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/the-world-according-to-k ant-book-symposium/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nAnja Jauernig’s recently published The World According to Kant (Oxford \, 2021) defends an interpretation of Kant’s critical idealism as an ontol ogical position\, according to which Kant can be considered a genuine idea list about empirical objects\, empirical minds\, and space time. Yet in co ntrast to other intentional objects\, appearances genuinely exist\, which is why Kant can also be considered a genuine realist about empirical objec ts\, empirical minds\, and space and time. This book spells out Kant’s cas e for critical idealism thus understood and clarifies Kant’s conception of appearances and things in themselves in relation to Kant’s Leibniz-Wolffi an predecessors.
\nAnja Jauernig (NYU)
\nBio:
\nAnja Jauernig is Professor of Philosoph y at New York University. She obtained her Ph.D. from Princeton University \, and held academic positions at the philosophy departments of the Univer sity of Notre Dame and the University of Pittsburgh before coming to NYU. Her research interests include Kant\, Early Modern Philosophy\, 19th and e arly 20th century German Philosophy\, Aesthetics\, and Animal Ethics.
\nPatricia Kitcher (Columbia)
\nBio:
\nPatricia Kitcher is Roberta and William Campbell Professor Emerita of Humanities and Professor Emerita of Philosophy at Columbia. Sh e has written two books on Kant’s theory of cognition and the self and is editor of the Oxford Philosophical Concepts volume on The Self.
\nAndrew Chignell (Princeton)
Bio: p>\n
Andrew Chignell is Laurence S. Rockefeller Professor in Religion\, Philosophy\, and the University Center for Human Values at Princeton. Pri or to that he was a Professor of Philosophy at Penn and Associate and Assi stant Professor in the Sage School of Philosophy at Cornell. His research interests are in early modern philosophy (especially Kant) and in philoso phy of religion\, moral psychology\, epistemology\, and food ethics. From 2020-2023 he served as President of the North American Kant Society.
\nDesmond Hogan (Princeton)
\nBio:
\nDesmond Hogan is Professor of Philosophy at Princeton Universi ty. He received his Ph.D. from Yale University. His research interests inc lude metaphysics\, philosophy of science\, ethics\, and aesthetics\, with a focus on the modern period and nineteenth century.
\nPresented by the New York German Idealism Workshop
\nPerfection and Morality: Kan t’s Critique of the Stoics. Stephen Engstrom. With response from Francey R ussell. @Columbia 22 September
\nHegel’s Theory of Absolute Spirit. Markus Grante. With response from Amelle Djemel. @New School 6 October
\nThe Argument of Kant’s Groundwork. Pauline Kleingeld. With r esponse by Patricia Kitcher. @Columbia 27 October
\nNathan DuFord tb d. With response by Chris O’Kane. @New School 10 November
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8082@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:nycwittgensteinworkshop@gmail.com DESCRIPTION:The importance of incorporating value pluralism into a theory o f justice is recognized in many conceptualizations of justice. This plural ism is often seen as a reason to attend to a range of perspectives\, persp ectives which can function as a source of information in determining which principles should guide justice. However\, philosophy’s ability to proper ly attend to different perspectives has received extensive attention in th e criticisms of various non-ideal theorists\, who argue that ideal-theoret ical philosophy runs the risk of excluding important aspects of actual soc ial problems. Taking these criticisms on board\, this paper builds on non- ideal theory by arguing for a Wittgensteinian family resemblance approach to justice. I will explain how this linguistic practice-embedded understan ding of justice can be a helpful tool for non-ideal theory\, as it can giv e us insight into why\, in various similar but different cases\, the notio n of justice is seen as applicable. In light of this approach\, I will sug gest a reorientation of the pluralist demand towards an empirical starting point. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231103T160000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231103T180000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:New School room 1101 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Non-Idea Justice: A Family Resemblance Approach. Nadia ben Hassine (Cambridge) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/non-idea-justice-a-famil y-resemblance-approach-nadia-ben-hassine-cambridge/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nThe importanc e of incorporating value pluralism into a theory of justice is recognized in many conceptualizations of justice. This pluralism is often seen as a r eason to attend to a range of perspectives\, perspectives which can functi on as a source of information in determining which principles should guide justice. However\, philosophy’s ability to properly attend to different p erspectives has received extensive attention in the criticisms of various non-ideal theorists\, who argue that ideal-theoretical philosophy runs the risk of excluding important aspects of actual social problems. Taking the se criticisms on board\, this paper builds on non-ideal theory by arguing for a Wittgensteinian family resemblance approach to justice. I will expla in how this linguistic practice-embedded understanding of justice can be a helpful tool for non-ideal theory\, as it can give us insight into why\, in various similar but different cases\, the notion of justice is seen as applicable. In light of this approach\, I will suggest a reorientation of the pluralist demand towards an empirical starting point.
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:justice\,social\,wittgenstein END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8059@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://nygiw.tumblr.com/ DESCRIPTION:Presented by the New York German Idealism Workshop\nPerfection and Morality: Kant’s Critique of the Stoics. Stephen Engstrom. With respon se from Francey Russell. @Columbia 22 September\nHegel’s Theory of Absolut e Spirit. Markus Grante. With response from Amelle Djemel. @New School 6 O ctober\nThe Argument of Kant’s Groundwork. Pauline Kleingeld. With respons e by Patricia Kitcher. @Columbia 27 October\nNathan DuFord tbd. With respo nse by Chris O’Kane. @New School 10 November DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20231110T163000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20231110T183000 GEO:+40.736998;-73.992251 LOCATION:New School tbd @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Nathan DuFord URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/nathan-duford/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nPresented by the New York German Idealism Workshop
\nPerfection and Morality: Kan t’s Critique of the Stoics. Stephen Engstrom. With response from Francey R ussell. @Columbia 22 September
\nHegel’s Theory of Absolute Spirit. Markus Grante. With response from Amelle Djemel. @New School 6 October
\nThe Argument of Kant’s Groundwork. Pauline Kleingeld. With r esponse by Patricia Kitcher. @Columbia 27 October
\nNathan DuFord tb d. With response by Chris O’Kane. @New School 10 November
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:German\,idealism END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8140@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/eyoewara DESCRIPTION:This talk reads contemporary debates about structural racism an d US history from the perspective of philosophical questions about identit y and difference. While many people have argued that America needs to come to terms with or “work through” the racism in its history that has shaped and continues to shape its present structures\, it remains difficult to e xplain what connects this past and the present. Are we talking about one r acism with many different past and present forms? Or are there multiple ra cisms that only share some similar features? In this talk\, I draw attenti on to how these divisions play out particularly in contemporary Black Stud ies and argue that the philosophy of Gilles Deleuze can offer us resources for thinking about these questions through his discussions of repetition. I argue that understanding our conversations about structural racism and history as conversations about a racism that repeats\, can help us to bett er understand why racism seems to reappear\, how to think its disparate fo rms together\, and what presuppositions operate in many attempts to “work through” the past.\nBio: Eyo Ewara is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago. His teaching and research explores the relatio nships between 20th Century Continental Philosophy\, Critical Philosophy o f Race\, and Queer Theory. His work has appeared in Theory and Event\, Pu ncta\, Philosophy Today\, Critical Philosophy of Race\, Political Theology \, and other venues. His current research project is particularly interest ed in engaging work in Continental Philosophy\, Queer Theory\, and Black S tudies to address questions of identity and difference amongst concepts of race\, forms of racism\, and forms of anti-racism. How can we better acco unt for the relations between at times radically disparate concepts\, stru ctures\, and practices such that they can all specifically and recognizabl y be called racial? What might our account of these relations say about ou r ability to address racism’s harms?\nTickets: https://event.newschool.edu /eyoewara. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240328T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240328T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Strange Returns: Racism\, Repetition and Working Through the Past presented by Eyo Ewara URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/strange-returns-racism-r epetition-and-working-through-the-past-presented-by-eyo-ewara/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nThis talk rea ds contemporary debates about structural racism and US history from the pe rspective of philosophical questions about identity and difference. While many people have argued that America needs to come to terms with or “work through” the racism in its history that has shaped and continues to shape its present structures\, it remains difficult to explain what connects thi s past and the present. Are we talking about one racism with many differen t past and present forms? Or are there multiple racisms that only share so me similar features? In this talk\, I draw attention to how these division s play out particularly in contemporary Black Studies and argue that the p hilosophy of Gilles Deleuze can offer us resources for thinking about thes e questions through his discussions of repetition. I argue that understand ing our conversations about structural racism and history as conversations about a racism that repeats\, can help us to better understand why racism seems to reappear\, how to think its disparate forms together\, and what presuppositions operate in many attempts to “work through” the past.
\nBio: Eyo Ewara is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Loyola University Chicago. His teaching and research explores the relatio nships between 20th Century Continental Philosophy\, Critical Philosophy o f Race\, and Queer Theory. His work has appeared in Theory and Event\, Pu ncta\, Philosophy Today\, Critical Philosophy of Race\, Political Theology \, and other venues. His current research project is particularly interest ed in engaging work in Continental Philosophy\, Queer Theory\, and Black S tudies to address questions of identity and difference amongst concepts of race\, forms of racism\, and forms of anti-racism. How can we better acco unt for the relations between at times radically disparate concepts\, stru ctures\, and practices such that they can all specifically and recognizabl y be called racial? What might our account of these relations say about ou r ability to address racism’s harms?
\nTickets: https://event .newschool.edu/eyoewara.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:history\,race X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/eyoewara END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8141@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/stephanesymons DESCRIPTION:In the final part of The Human Condition (1958) Hannah Arendt t urns to the danger of ‘world- alienation’. Based on a variety of discoveri es and evolutions that are constitutive of modernity (globalization\, Prot estantism\, the invention of the telescope)\, modern man has adopted an Ar chimedean\, external position vis-à-vis the world. According to Arendt\, this ‘view from without’ has gradually jeopardized the experience of a sha red world\, endangering the foundation of all meaning-giving activities.\n My talk can be considered as a reply to Arendt’s pessimistic account of mo dern ‘world-alienation’. It builds on the idea that some of the most influ ential thinkers of the twentieth century (Ernst Jünger\, Georg Lukács\, Ernst Bloch\, Theodor Adorno\, Walter Benjamin\, Aby Warburg\, Sigmund Fre ud) did not equate the loss of a shared world with the loss of meaning. Ra ther\, the conceptual framework of a substantial part of early twentieth c entury German philosophy centers on the exploration of a productive opposi tion\, negation or fragmentation of the world. From the perspective of the se thinkers\, the world’s ‘durability’ (Arendt) is not simply a source of shared meaning since it can be experienced as the mark of its indifference to change and renewal.\nBio:\nStéphane Symons is Full Professor of Philos ophy at the Institute of Philosophy of the University of Leuven\, Belgium. His research is focused on interwar German thought (Frankfurt School) and postwar French philosophy (structuralism and post-structuralism).\nTicket s: https://event.newschool.edu/stephanesymons. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240404T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240404T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:The Concept of World-Alienation in Twentieth Century German Thought – presented by Stéphane Symons URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/the-concept-of-world-ali enation-in-twentieth-century-german-thought-presented-by-stephane-symons/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nIn the final part of The Human Condition (1958) Hannah Arendt turns to the dan ger of ‘world- alienation’. Based on a variety of discoveries and evolutio ns that are constitutive of modernity (globalization\, Protestantism\, the invention of the telescope)\, modern man has adopted an Archimedean\, ext ernal position vis-à-vis the world. According to Arendt\, this ‘view from without’ has gradually jeopardized the experience of a shared world\, end angering the foundation of all meaning-giving activities.
\nMy talk can be considered as a reply to Arendt’s pessimistic account of modern ‘wo rld-alienation’. It builds on the idea that some of the most influential t hinkers of the twentieth century (Ernst Jünger\, Georg Lukács\, Ernst Bl och\, Theodor Adorno\, Walter Benjamin\, Aby Warburg\, Sigmund Freud) did not equate the loss of a shared world with the loss of meaning. Rather\, t he conceptual framework of a substantial part of early twentieth century G erman philosophy centers on the exploration of a productive opposition\, n egation or fragmentation of the world. From the perspective of these think ers\, the world’s ‘durability’ (Arendt) is not simply a source of shared m eaning since it can be experienced as the mark of its indifference to chan ge and renewal.
\nBio:
\nStéphane Symons is F ull Professor of Philosophy at the Institute of Philosophy of the Universi ty of Leuven\, Belgium. His research is focused on interwar German thought (Frankfurt School) and postwar French philosophy (structuralism and post- structuralism).
\nTickets: https://event.newschool.edu/ stephanesymons.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:existentialism\,German X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/stephanesymons END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-8142@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240329T143915Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/sophieloidolt DESCRIPTION:What does it mean to be\, appear\, and act in public? These que stions are rarely asked when it comes to the often-diagnosed “structural t ransformation” (Habermas) of the public sphere. Yet people have a wide var iety of “public experiences” every day: from the simple experience of leav ing the house and moving on the street to highly networked and technologic ally mediated public communication and concerted action. In the project I would like to present in its outlines\, I try to shed light on the quality and structure of such “public experiences” using a phenomenological appro ach. In this way\, I want to reclaim public space as an experiential space and argue that experiences matter for the constitution of different kinds of public spheres and public spaces.\nHow\, for example\, do phenomena li ke visibility\, attention\, relevance\, reality\, trust\, or their opposit es emerge in public contexts? And how can our individual and collective ex periences of the public retain its high democratic ideals while facing the constant threat of superficial entertainment and self-commercialization? In contrast to theories that view the public sphere primarily as a system of information\, coordination\, or discourse\, a phenomenological approach aims to reveal the ways in which experiences constitute spaces of meaning . Such a disclosure of the world-building function of experience is crucia l if we are to understand how people can relate to their public existence and a public world\, how they can integrate into it or fall away from it\, gain or lose trust\, and how a shared world is either built or destroyed. \n \n Bio:\nSophie Loidolt is Professor of philosophy and Chair of Practic al Philosophy at the Technical University of Darmstadt\, Germany. She is a recurrent visiting professor at Center for Subjectivity Research in Copen hagen and the president of the German Society for Phenomenological Researc h. Most of her education took place at the University of Vienna. Research stays brought her to the Husserl-Archives in Leuven\, St. Denis University in Paris\, and the New School of Social Research in New York.\nHer work c enters on issues in the fields of phenomenology\, political and legal phil osophy\, and ethics\, as well as transcendental philosophy and philosophy of mind. Her book Phenomenology of Plurality. Hannah Arendt on Political I ntersubjectivity (Routledge 2017) won the Edward Goodwin Ballard Book Priz e in 2018. Other books include: Anspruch und Rechtfertigung. Eine Theorie des rechtlichen Denkens im Anschluss an die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls (Springer 2009)\, Einführung in die Rechtsphänomenologie (Mohr Siebeck 20 10\; Japanese translation will appear in 2024).\nTickets: https://event.ne wschool.edu/sophieloidolt. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20240411T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20240411T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:On Being\, Appearing\, and Acting in Public. Towards a Phenomenolog ical Theory of the Public Realm – presented by Sophie Loidolt URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/on-being-appearing-and-a cting-in-public-towards-a-phenomenological-theory-of-the-public-realm-pres ented-by-sophie-loidolt/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nWhat does it mean to be\, appear\, and act in public? These questions are rarely asked when it comes to the often-diagnosed “structural transformation” (Habermas ) of the public sphere. Yet people have a wide variety of “public experien ces” every day: from the simple experience of leaving the house and moving on the street to highly networked and technologically mediated public com munication and concerted action. In the project I would like to present in its outlines\, I try to shed light on the quality and structure of such “ public experiences” using a phenomenological approach. In this way\, I wan t to reclaim public space as an experiential space and argue that experien ces matter for the constitution of different kinds of public spheres and p ublic spaces.
\nHow\, for example\, do phenomena like visibility\, a ttention\, relevance\, reality\, trust\, or their opposites emerge in publ ic contexts? And how can our individual and collective experiences of the public retain its high democratic ideals while facing the constant threat of superficial entertainment and self-commercialization? In contrast to th eories that view the public sphere primarily as a system of information\, coordination\, or discourse\, a phenomenological approach aims to reveal t he ways in which experiences constitute spaces of meaning. Such a disclosu re of the world-building function of experience is crucial if we are to un derstand how people can relate to their public existence and a public worl d\, how they can integrate into it or fall away from it\, gain or lose tru st\, and how a shared world is either built or destroyed.
\n\n< p> Bio:\n
Sophie Loidolt is Professor of philosophy and Chair of Practical Philosophy at the Technical University of Darmstad t\, Germany. She is a recurrent visiting professor at Center for Subjectiv ity Research in Copenhagen and the president of the German Society for Phe nomenological Research. Most of her education took place at the University of Vienna. Research stays brought her to the Husserl-Archives in Leuven\, St. Denis University in Paris\, and the New School of Social Research in New York.
\nHer work centers on issues in the fields of phenomenolog y\, political and legal philosophy\, and ethics\, as well as transcendenta l philosophy and philosophy of mind. Her book Phenomenology of Plurali ty. Hannah Arendt on Political Intersubjectivity (Routledge 2017) won the Edward Goodwin Ballard Book Prize in 2018. Other books include: A nspruch und Rechtfertigung. Eine Theorie des rechtlichen Denkens im Anschl uss an die Phänomenologie Edmund Husserls (Springer 2009)\, Einfü hrung in die Rechtsphänomenologie (Mohr Siebeck 2010\; Japanese trans lation will appear in 2024).
\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:phenomenology\,public X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/sophieloidolt END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR