BEGIN:VCALENDAR VERSION:2.0 PRODID:-//208.94.116.123//NONSGML kigkonsult.se iCalcreator 2.26.9// CALSCALE:GREGORIAN METHOD:PUBLISH X-FROM-URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress X-WR-TIMEZONE:America/New_York BEGIN:VTIMEZONE TZID:America/New_York X-LIC-LOCATION:America/New_York BEGIN:STANDARD DTSTART:20231105T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0400 TZOFFSETTO:-0500 RDATE:20241103T020000 TZNAME:EST END:STANDARD BEGIN:DAYLIGHT DTSTART:20240310T020000 TZOFFSETFROM:-0500 TZOFFSETTO:-0400 RDATE:20250309T020000 TZNAME:EDT END:DAYLIGHT END:VTIMEZONE BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7763@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240319T033408Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://withinenvironments2022.weebly.com/ DESCRIPTION:Since Plato\, western philosophy has been set down a path paved by a disavowal of the sensuous\, bracketed material bodies\, and delimite d aesthetic conceptions\, leaving human beings and their built environment s separated from the natural world. Such exclusions have left philosophy i ll-equipped to deal with the various environmental crises we currently fac e\, as economic rationality and utilitarian logic further de-animate the w orld and sharpen the human/nature distinction. Even the concept “environme nt” often\, and ironically\, brings with it implicit anthropocentric assum ptions\, conceptualizing\, and thereby separating\, the human as independe nt from the surrounding world and reinforcing the human/nature divide. As a result\, our (mis)understandings of “nature” and “environment” may make us insensitive to and perpetuate\, rather than address\, climate change an d other environmental catastrophes. To avoid ambiguities and clarify our u nderstanding\, we must ask: what role does Nature play within our theories and practices concerning so-called Environmental Philosophy? Furthermore\ , what spaces\, practices\, and questions are made possible when we broade n our understanding of “environment” to include a more robust conceptualiz ation of the natural world and how the human being ought to be contextuali zed within it?\nThis conference asks how we might reorient the language an d practices of philosophy in a way that can enable us to adequately respon d to ongoing environmental crises. As a starting point\, we propose a need to reimagine the concepts “human\,” “nature\,” and “environment\,” as wel l as the reciprocal relations that constitute them. To recognize humans as natural organisms\, we must reevaluate the sensuous\, the material\, and the aesthetic and the roles they play in our attempts to construct\, under stand\, and preserve our environment(s). How should we make sense of our p ractices and our relations to those with whom we share our surroundings? H ow can we re-situate the human with/in the environment? Do we have the rig ht tools to guide these investigations? How might philosophy look beyond i tself—to literature\, architecture\, music\, film\, design—to better bring Environment\, and thus the world\, into view? In the spirit of this\, we invite paper as well as project submissions from current graduate students in any discipline.\nPossible Topics:\n● Environmental Aesthetics: Re-Considering Beauty + the Sublime\n● Environmental Justice + Rest orative Justice + Transformative Justice\n● Environmental Ethics + Sustainable Practices\n● Diversity + Biodiversity\n● Capital ism and Climate\n● Eco-phenomenology\n● Eco-deconstruction\n ● Environmental Racism/Racist Environments\n● Ecofeminist co nceptions of nature\n● Land Rights and Property Relations\n● Posthumanism + Object Ontologies\n● Afrofuturism + Technological U topias\n● Environmental Ethics In Narratives\n● Mastery of N ature in Philosophy\n● Anarcho-primitivism\n● Queer and Tran s Ecologies\n● Local and Global Ecologies\n● Regionalisms an d Globalisms in the Ecological Imagination\n \nConfirmed Conference Keynot es:\nSandra Shapshay\, CUNY Graduate Center\, New York\nEmanuele Coccia\, École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)\, Paris\nDates and Lo cation:\nThis conference will be held at the New School for Social Researc h in New York City from Thursday\, April 14\, to Saturday\, April 16. Whil e we (tentatively) plan to hold the conference primarily in-person we woul d also like to provide a hybrid option for those who would prefer to parti cipate remotely. Following the conference\, on Sunday\, April 17\, all par ticipants and attendees are invited to participate in a conference hike in Cold Spring\, NY (about an hour and a half north of NYC and accessible by the Metro North commuter train).\nCall for Papers: Submission Procedure: \nPlease submit complete papers (Word Limit: 3500) and an abstract of 250 words or less by January 1st in the form of a Word attachment (.docx) or P DF to WithInEnvironments@gmail.com. Please prepare your submission for bli nd review by removing any identifying information from the body of the pap er. In your email please include your name\, affiliation\, and paper title . Notification of acceptance will be sent by January 15.\nCall for Project s: Submission Procedure:\nPlease submit a project description (Word Limit: 1000) by December 1st in the form of a Word attachment (.docx) to WithInE nvironments@gmail.com\, as well as:\nFor Visual Arts projects: submit 5 im ages of your work as .jpeg.\nFor Performing Arts projects: submit video/ a udio of your work in .mp4 format\nPlease prepare your submission for blind review by removing any identifying information. In your email please incl ude your name\, affiliation\, and project title. Notification of acceptanc e will be sent by January 15.\nIf you have any questions please email With InEnvironments@gmail.com\n https://withinenvironments2022.weebly.com/ \n\n DTSTART;VALUE=DATE:20220414 DTEND;VALUE=DATE:20220417 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:New School Dept. of Philosophy @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003 \, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:With/In Environments: Reimagining Frameworks and Practices for Envi ronmental Philosophy–Graduate Student Conference URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/with-in-environments-rei magining-frameworks-and-practices-for-environmental-philosophy-graduate-st udent-conference/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n
\\nSince Plato\, western philosophy has been set down a path pave d by a disavowal of the sensuous\, bracketed material bodies\, and delimit ed aesthetic conceptions\, leaving human beings and their built environmen ts separated from the natural world. Such exclusions have left philosophy ill-equipped to deal with the various environmental crises we currently fa ce\, as economic rationality and utilitarian logic further de-animate the world and sharpen the human/nature distinction. Even the concept “environm ent” often\, and ironically\, brings with it implicit anthropocentric assu mptions\, conceptualizing\, and thereby separating\, the human as independ ent from the surrounding world and reinforcing the human/nature divide. As a result\, our (mis)understandings of “nature” and “environment” may make us insensitive to and perpetuate\, rather than address\, climate change a nd other environmental catastrophes. To avoid ambiguities and clarify our understanding\, we must ask: what role does Nature play within our theorie s and practices concerning so-called Environmental Philosophy? Furthermore \, what spaces\, practices\, and questions are made possible when we broad en our understanding of “environment” to include a more robust conceptuali zation of the natural world and how the human being ought to be contextual ized within it?
\nThis conference asks how we might reorient the lan guage and practices of philosophy in a way that can enable us to adequatel y respond to ongoing environmental crises. As a starting point\, we propos e a need to reimagine the concepts “human\,” “nature\,” and “environment\, ” as well as the reciprocal relations that constitute them. To recognize h umans as natural organisms\, we must reevaluate the sensuous\, the materia l\, and the aesthetic and the roles they play in our attempts to construct \, understand\, and preserve our environment(s). How should we make sense of our practices and our relations to those with whom we share our surroun dings? How can we re-situate the human with/in the environment? Do we have the right tools to guide these investigations? How might philosophy look beyond itself—to literature\, architecture\, music\, film\, design—to bett er bring Environment\, and thus the world\, into view? In the spirit of th is\, we invite paper as well as project submissions from current graduate students in any discipline.
\nPossible Topics:
\n● Environmental Aesthetics: Re-Considering Beauty + the Sublim e
\n● Environmental Justice + Restorative Justice + Transform ative Justice
\n● Environmental Ethics + Sustainable Practice s
\n● Diversity + Biodiversity
\n● Capitalism an d Climate
\n● Eco-phenomenology
\n● Eco-deconstr uction
\n● Environmental Racism/Racist Environments
\n● Ecofeminist conceptions of nature
\n● Land Rights and Property Relations
\n● Posthumanism + Object Ontologies
\n● Afrofuturism + Technological Utopias
\n● Enviro nmental Ethics In Narratives
\n● Mastery of Nature in Philoso phy
\n● Anarcho-primitivism
\n● Queer and Trans Ecologies
\n● Local and Global Ecologies
\n● Reg ionalisms and Globalisms in the Ecological Imagination
\nstrong>
\nConfirmed Conference Keynotes:
\nSa ndra Shapshay\, CUNY Graduate Center\, New York
\nEmanuele Coccia\, École des hautes études en sciences sociales (EHESS)\, Paris
\nThis conference will be held at th e New School for Social Research in New York City from Thursday\, April 14 \, to Saturday\, April 16. While we (tentatively) plan to hold the confere nce primarily in-person we would also like to provide a hybrid option for those who would prefer to participate remotely. Following the conference\, on Sunday\, April 17\, all participants and attendees are invited to part icipate in a conference hike in Cold Spring\, NY (about an hour and a half north of NYC and accessible by the Metro North commuter train).
\n< strong>Call for Papers: Submission Procedure:
\nPlease subm it complete papers (Word Limit: 3500) and an abstract of 250 words or less by January 1st in the form of a Word attachment (.docx) or PDF to WithInEnvironments@g mail.com. Please prepare your submission for blind review by removing any identifying information from the body of the paper. In your email plea se include your name\, affiliation\, and paper title. Notification of acce ptance will be sent by January 15.
\nCall for Projects: Subm ission Procedure:
\nPlease submit a project description (Wo rd Limit: 1000) by December 1st in the form of a Word attachment (.docx) t o WithInEnvir onments@gmail.com\, as well as:
\nFor Visual Arts projects: subm it 5 images of your work as .jpeg.
\nFor Performing Arts projects: s ubmit video/ audio of your work in .mp4 format
\nPlease prepare your submission for blind review by removing any identifying information. In y our email please include your name\, affiliation\, and project title. Noti fication of acceptance will be sent by January 15.
\nIf you have any questions please email WithInEnvironments@gmail.com
\n\n\n
\n |
Is feminism in crisis? Recently\, in the United States and abroad\, historic events rendered ever more preca rious the lives and well-being of people marginalized by their sex\, gende r\, race\, and class\, often in complexly intersecting and regionally spec ific ways. The rise of right-wing populism transnationally and attacks on reproductive rights\, for example\, exacerbate the challenges feminists co nfront. At the same time\, as external conditions shift\, feminism’s own f aultlines continue to deepen. Feminism’s rising trans-exclusionary conting ent\, certain feminists’ hesitancy to reckon with complicity in racial and colonial violence\, and the ongoing cooptation of feminism by neoliberali sm signal serious internal fractures.
\nAs feminism faces external a nd internal pressures\, how can philosophy help us understand this moment of potential crisis and what\, if anything\, can philosophy do to address it? To devise answers to these urgent questions\, we welcome contributions that focus on:
\n1. The relation between feminism and philosoph y\, including how feminism should intervene in philosophical debates\, and how philosophy should intervene in feminist debates\;
\n2. Ques tions concerning the nature and practice of gender\, sex\, sexuality\, rac e\, class\, and disability that draw on feminist literatures or methodolog ies\;
\n3. Perspectives that integrate different feminist tradit ions to build intersectional and transnational feminist coalitions\;
\n4. Analyses of discourses on sex\, gender\, sexuality\, race\, clas s\, and disability in media\, law\, and the sciences\;
\n5. Tran slating feminist views on sex\, gender\, sexuality\, race\, class\, and di sability into public policy and social advocacy.
\nWe welcome contri butions from scholars working in philosophy and who draw on a variety of d isciplinary perspectives. Scholars of all identities\, especially those fr om groups underrepresented and/or marginalized in academia\, are encourage d to submit contributions.
\nPlease send anonymized abstracts of up to 500 words to cunygc.philosophy.conference@gmail.com\, along with any q uestions you may have. The deadline for submissions is September 7th.
\nBook Panel with:
\nChiara Bottici (NSSR and Lang College)\, Judith Butler (UC Berkeley and NSSR) and Romy Opperman (NSSR and Lang College).
\n< strong>Abstract:
\nHow can we be sure the oppressed do not become oppressors in their turn? How can we envisage a feminism that does n’t turn into yet another tool for oppression? By arguing that there is no single arche explaining the oppression of women and LGBTQI+ people\, Chia ra Bottici proposes a radical anarchafeminist philosophy inspired by two m ajor claims: that there is something specific to the oppression of ‘the se cond sexes’\, and that\, in order to fight that\, we need to untangle all other forms of oppression and the anthropocentrism they inhabit. On the ba sis of a Spinozist philosophy of transindividuality\, Anarchafeminism call s for a decolonial and deimperial attitude and for a renewed awareness of the somatic communism connecting all different life forms on the planet. I n this revolutionary vision\, feminism does not mean the liberation of the lucky few\, but liberation of the planet from both capitalist exploitatio n and an anthropocentric politics of domination. Either the entire planet\ , or none of us will be free.
\n\n
External visitors must com ply with the university’s guest policy as outlined here: https://www.newsc hool.edu/covid-19/campus-access/?open=visitors.
\n\n
Audi ence members must show proof of a full COVID-19 vaccination series (and bo oster if eligible)\, ID\, and remain masked at all times.
\nSponsore d by the NSSR Philosophy Department & The Gender and Sexualities Studies I nstitute (GSSI)
\nTickets: https:/ /event.newschool.edu/philosophycolloquiumanarchafeminism.
HTML> X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:feminism\,gender\,political\,sexuality X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/philosophycolloquiumanarchafemini sm END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7875@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240319T033408Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/philosophycolloquiumpennydeutscher DESCRIPTION:Abstract:\nAs a specific form of rights insecurity the revocabi lity of reproductive rights manifests contradictory understandings (privat ive and productive) of the political status of pregnancy.\nI ask how and w hy we should understand reproductive rights as revocable\, giving a broad meaning to the term “revocability\,” and suggesting a conjoined vocabulary that includes conditionality\, exceptionality\, and disqualifying qualifi cation.\nI ask: what kind of grammar might help us understand more specifi cally how the concurrent action of conflicting combinations of power (such as sovereignty\, discipline\, security\, necropower\, and neoliberal expe ctation) coordinate together in relation to reproductive rights-bearing\, and how heterogeneous combinations of power also produce a mutual disrupti veness\, even auto-critique\, manifesting as conflictual embodiment.\nExte rnal visitors must comply with the university’s guest policy as outlined h ere: https://www.newschool.edu/covid-19/campus-access/?open=visitors.\n \n Audience members must show proof of a full COVID-19 vaccination series (an d booster if eligible)\, ID\, and remain masked at all times.\nTickets: ht tps://event.newschool.edu/philosophycolloquiumpennydeutscher#rsvp. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221020T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221020T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Revokable Rights and their Grammar of Power: Post Roe\, Post Foucau lt. Penelope Deutscher (Northwestern U) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/revokable-rights-and-the ir-grammar-of-power-post-roe-post-foucault-penelope-deutscher-northwestern -u/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nAbstr act:
\nAs a specific form of rights insecurity the revocabi lity of reproductive rights manifests contradictory understandings (privat ive and productive) of the political status of pregnancy.
\nI ask ho w and why we should understand reproductive rights as revocable\, giving a broad meaning to the term “revocability\,” and suggesting a conjoined voc abulary that includes conditionality\, exceptionality\, and disqualifying qualification.
\nI ask: what kind of grammar might help us understan d more specifically how the concurrent action of conflicting combinations of power (such as sovereignty\, discipline\, security\, necropower\, and n eoliberal expectation) coordinate together in relation to reproductive rig hts-bearing\, and how heterogeneous combinations of power also produce a m utual disruptiveness\, even auto-critique\, manifesting as conflictual emb odiment.
\nExternal visitors must comply with the university’s guest policy as outlined here: https://www.newschool.edu/covid-19/campus-acces s/?open=visitors.
\n\n
Audience members must show proof o f a full COVID-19 vaccination series (and booster if eligible)\, ID\, and remain masked at all times.
\nTickets: https://event.newschool.edu/philosophycolloquiumpennydeutscher#rs vp.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:feminism\,language\,political X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/philosophycolloquiumpennydeutsche r#rsvp END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7833@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240319T033408Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/SusanneSreedhar DESCRIPTION:Even on a close reading of Hobbes’s corpus\, it is difficult to extract a clear picture of his views on gender.\nIn the history of philos ophy\, most of the ‘great’ philosophers engaged with questions about women ’s ‘nature’ and the appropriate role for women in the family\, society\, a nd state.\nHobbes\, however\, seems to have far less to say on the subject than most\, and what he does say is often ambiguous or paradoxical.\nIt i s a fundamental tenet of Hobbes’s political theory that all people are equ al in the state of nature\, women included\; yet he makes reference to the general superiority of men as regards physical strength\, courage\, wit\, and suitability for rule.\nHobbes denies the naturalness\, inevitability\ , and godliness of patriarchy\, and he even argues for natural maternal ri ght\; however\, he describes families in civil societies in terms of fathe rs ruling over their servants and children—leaving women out of the pictur e altogether.\nHis texts are peppered with various offhand comments\, allu sions\, and intimations about women and sexuality more generally\, many of which are provocative and undeveloped. \nOne of the most intriguing parts of his analysis is his repeated appeal to the example of the ancient Amaz onian warrior women who engaged in procreative contracts with men from nei ghboring tribes. \n \nIn this paper\, the speaker uses Hobbes’s discussion of the Amazons to examine his views about gender and\, thereby\, his plac e in the history of philosophy as seen from a feminist perspective. \n \nE xternal visitors must comply with the university’s guest policy as outline d here:\n https://www.newschool.edu/covid-19/campus-access/?open=visitors \n \nAudience members must show proof of a full COVID-19 vaccination serie s (and booster if eligible)\, ID\, and remain masked at all times.\nTicket s: https://event.newschool.edu/SusanneSreedhar. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20221027T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20221027T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Hobbes on Sex. Susanne Sreedhar (BU) URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/hobbes-on-sex-susanne-sr eedhar-bu/ X-COST-TYPE:external X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nEven on a clo se reading of Hobbes’s corpus\, it is difficult to extract a clear picture of his views on gender.
\nIn the history of philosophy\, most of th e ‘great’ philosophers engaged with questions about women’s ‘nature’ and t he appropriate role for women in the family\, society\, and state.
\nHobbes\, however\, seems to have far less to say on the subject than most \, and what he does say is often ambiguous or paradoxical.
\nIt is a fundamental tenet of Hobbes’s political theory that all people are equal in the state of nature\, women included\; yet he makes reference to the ge neral superiority of men as regards physical strength\, courage\, wit\, an d suitability for rule.
\nHobbes denies the naturalness\, inevitabil ity\, and godliness of patriarchy\, and he even argues for natural materna l right\; however\, he describes families in civil societies in terms of f athers ruling over their servants and children—leaving women out of the pi cture altogether.
\nHis texts are peppered with various offhan d comments\, allusions\, and intimations about women and sexuality more ge nerally\, many of which are provocative and undeveloped.
\n< span>One of the most intriguing parts of his analysis is his repeated appe al to the example of the ancient Amazonian warrior women who engaged in pr ocreative contracts with men from neighboring tribes.
\n\n
In this paper\, the speaker uses Hobbes’s discussion of the Am azons to examine his views about gender and\, thereby\, his place in the h istory of philosophy as seen from a feminist perspective.
\n\n
External visitors must comply with the university’ s guest policy as outlined here:
\nht tps://www.newschool.edu/covid-19/campus-access/?open=visitors strong>
\n\n
Audience members must show proof of a fu ll COVID-19 vaccination series (and booster if eligible)\, ID\, and remain masked at all times.
\nTickets: https://even t.newschool.edu/SusanneSreedhar.
X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:feminism\,gender\,sexuality X-TICKETS-URL:https://event.newschool.edu/SusanneSreedhar END:VEVENT BEGIN:VEVENT UID:ai1ec-7937@www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress DTSTAMP:20240319T033408Z CATEGORIES;LANGUAGE=en-US:New School for Social Research CONTACT:https://event.newschool.edu/bookpanelafeministmythology DESCRIPTION:A Feminist Mythology\, Bloomsbury\, 2022\nA book panel with Chr isten Clifford (The New School)\, Jean-Michel Rabate’ (University of Penns ylvania)\, Rose Rejouis (The New School) and a response by Chiara Bottici. \nA Feminist Mythology takes us on a poetic journey through the canonical myths of femininity\, testing them from the point of view of our modern co ndition. A myth is not an object\, but rather a process\, one that Chiara Bottici practises by exploring different variants of the myth of “womanhoo d” through first- and third-person prose and poetry. We follow a series of myths that morph into each other\, disclosing ways of being woman that qu estion inherited patriarchal orders. In this metamorphic world\, story-tel ling is not just a mix of narrative\, philosophical dialogues and metaphys ical theorizing: it is a current that traverses all of them by overflowing the boundaries it encounters. In doing so\, A Feminist Mythology proposes an alternative writing style that recovers ancient philosophical and lite rary traditions from the pre-Socratic philosophers and Ovid’s Metamorphose s to the philosophical novellas and feminist experimental writings of the last century. DTSTART;TZID=America/New_York:20230210T180000 DTEND;TZID=America/New_York:20230210T200000 GEO:+40.73702;-73.992243 LOCATION:Wolff Conference Room/D1103 @ 6 E 16th St\, New York\, NY 10003\, USA SEQUENCE:0 SUMMARY:Book Panel “A Feminist Mythology” URL:https://www.noahgreenstein.com/wordpress/event/book-panel-a-feminist-my thology/ X-COST-TYPE:free X-ALT-DESC;FMTTYPE=text/html:\\n\\n\\nA Femini st Mythology\, Bloomsbury\, 2022
\nA book panel wi th Christen Clifford (The New School)\, Jean-Mich el Rabate’ (University of Pennsylvania)\, Rose Rejouis (The New School) and a response by Chiara Bottici.
\nA Feminist Mythology takes us on a poetic journey throug h the canonical myths of femininity\, testing them from the point of view of our modern condition. A myth is not an object\, but rather a process\, one that Chiara Bottici practises by exploring different variants of the m yth of “womanhood” through first- and third-person prose and poetry. We fo llow a series of myths that morph into each other\, disclosing ways of bei ng woman that question inherited patriarchal orders. In this metamorphic w orld\, story-telling is not just a mix of narrative\, philosophical dialog ues and metaphysical theorizing: it is a current that traverses all of the m by overflowing the boundaries it encounters. In doing so\, A Feminis t Mythology proposes an alternative writing style that recovers ancie nt philosophical and literary traditions from the pre-Socratic philosopher s and Ovid’s Metamorphoses to the philosophical novellas and feminist expe rimental writings of the last century.
\nSWIP–NYC Sue Weinberg Lecture Series presents:
Grit & Imposter Syndrome
Jennifer Morton (University of Pennsylvania)
Talk Title: Interpreting Obstacles
&
Leonie Smith (<
/span>University of Manchester<
span dir='ltr' role='presentation'>)
Talk Title: Class\, Academia\, and Imposter Syndrome
Friday\, March 17
5–7
p.m.
CUNY Graduate Center
365 5
Room 9207
QUESTIONS? EMAIL swipnyc@gmail.com
The speaker w ill explain the meaning of concepts of movements such as communism\, liber alism\, and republicanism. Then she will argue how these concepts were use d as guides to praxis by focusing first on republicanism and Kant. Finally \, she will articulate her concept of feminist imaginaries focusing on how the sediments of historical time have enabled different struggles for ema ncipation.
\n“Feminism as a Concept of Movement: the Sediments of the Historical Reorganization of Feminist Imaginaries” prese nted by Maria Pia Lara
\n\n X-TAGS;LANGUAGE=en-US:feminism\,political END:VEVENT END:VCALENDAR