27 Mon
All-day
12:00 am
1:00 am
2:00 am
3:00 am
4:00 am
5:00 am
6:00 am
7:00 am
8:00 am
9:00 am
10:00 am
11:00 am
12:00 pm
1:00 pm
2:00 pm
3:00 pm
4:00 pm
5:00 pm
6:00 pm
7:00 pm
8:00 pm
9:00 pm
10:00 pm
11:00 pm
3:00 pm The New York Philosophy of Language Workshop @ ZOOM - see site for details
The New York Philosophy of Language Workshop @ ZOOM - see site for details
Sep 27 @ 3:00 pm – 5:00 pm
We’re a community of philosophers of language centered in New York City. We have a meeting each week at which a speaker presents a piece of their own work relating to the philosophy of language. During Spring 2020, we’ll meet online on Mondays from 3pm until 5pm (Eastern Time). Details and zoom links will be posted on this site. Anyone with an interest in philosophy of language is welcome! September 20th (special time: 4:30–6pm) Diego[...]
4:15 pm Logic & Metaphysics Workshop @ ZOOM - see site for details
Logic & Metaphysics Workshop @ ZOOM - see site for details
Sep 27 @ 4:15 pm – 6:15 pm
The Logic and Metaphysics Workshop will be meeting on Mondays from 4:15 to 6:15 (NY time) entirely online, unless otherwise noted. The provisional schedule is as follows: Sep 13. Ricki Bliss (Lehigh University) Sep 20. Teresa Kouri Kissel (Old Dominion University) Sep 27. Rashed Ahmad (University of Connecticut) Oct 4. Yale Weiss (CUNY GC) Oct 11. NO MEETING Oct 18. Rohit Parikh (CUNY GC) Oct 25. Noah Friedman-Biglin (San José State University) Nov 1. Thomas[...]
6:00 pm Robert Iliffe – ‘A Thousand Fictions’: Cultism and Delusional Metaphysics in the Newton-Leibniz Disputes @ ZOOM - see site for details
Robert Iliffe – ‘A Thousand Fictions’: Cultism and Delusional Metaphysics in the Newton-Leibniz Disputes @ ZOOM - see site for details
Sep 27 @ 6:00 pm – 7:30 pm
The rich philosophical and mathematical disputes that took place between Isaac Newton and Gottfried Leibniz at the start of the eighteenth century have received more historical attention than any other exchange in the history of philosophy. Nevertheless, in this talk, Robert Iliffe discusses a prominent but neglected aspect of their disagreement, namely the mutual claim that their opponents’ conceptual foundations were fictional, and were the product both of diseased thinking and of illegitimately organized intellectual[...]