| 7 Fri |
|---|
|
All-day
“Secularism and Its Discontents”: 16th Annual Philosophy Graduate Conference
@ NSSR Philosophy Dept
“Secularism and Its Discontents”: 16th Annual Philosophy Graduate Conference
@ NSSR Philosophy Dept
Apr 7 all-day
“Secularism and Its Discontents” The New School for Social Research 16th Annual Philosophy Graduate Student Conference Keynote Speaker: Gil Anidjar (Columbia) Keynote Roundtable Featuring: Simon Critchley (The New School) and others TBA With the increased social secularization in the West, philosophy, politics, and religion have become strange bedfellows. This emphasis on secularization has sparked controversies concerning the role of religion in the political sphere that have taken the form of lawsuits against forced funding of[...]
|
|
12:00 am
1:00 am
2:00 am
3:00 am
4:00 am
5:00 am
6:00 am
7:00 am
8:00 am
9:00 am
10:00 am
11:00 am
12:00 pm
1:00 pm
2:00 pm
3:00 pm
4:00 pm
5:00 pm
6:00 pm
7:00 pm
8:00 pm
9:00 pm
10:00 pm
11:00 pm
1:00 pm
Cognitive Science Speaker Series
@ CUNY Grad Center, rm 7102
Cognitive Science Speaker Series
@ CUNY Grad Center, rm 7102
Apr 7 @ 1:00 pm – 3:00 pm
Spring 2017, Fridays, 1-3 pm Room 7102, CUNY Graduate Center February 17: Frédérique de Vignemont Philosophy, Columbia University and Institut Jean Nicod, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) “Bodily Awareness: Feeling or Knowing?” February 24: Sarah Allred Psychology, Rutgers University “How Memory and Perception Interact to Guide Behavior” March 3: William G. Lycan Philosophy, University of North Carolina at[...]
3:30 pm
Hannah Ginsborg (Berkeley)
@ NYU Philosophy Dept. rm 202
Hannah Ginsborg (Berkeley)
@ NYU Philosophy Dept. rm 202
Apr 7 @ 3:30 pm
Hannah Ginsborg (Berkeley) Friday, April 7, 2017, 3:30 p.m. 5 Washington Place, Room 202 Talk title and abstract forthcoming.
5:00 pm
Koellner: Gödel’s Disjunction
@ 716 Philosophy Hall
Koellner: Gödel’s Disjunction
@ 716 Philosophy Hall
Apr 7 @ 5:00 pm
Gödel’s disjunction asserts that either “the mind cannot be mechanized” or “there are absolutely undecidable statements.” Arguments are examined for and against each disjunct in the context of precise frameworks governing the notions of absolute provability and truth. The focus is on Penrose’s new argument, which interestingly involves type-free truth. In order to reconstruct Penrose’s argument, a system, DKT, is devised for absolute provability and type-free truth. It turns out that in this setting there[...]
|
Subscribe