“Why Care About What There Is” Daniel Korman (UCSB)

March 15, 2019 @ 3:30 pm – 5:30 pm
NYU Philosophy Dept. rm 202
5 Washington Pl
New York, NY 10003

There’s the question of what there is, and then there’s the question of what ultimately exists. Many contend that, once we have this distinction clearly in mind, we can see that there is no sensible debate to be had about whether there are such things as properties or tables or numbers, and that the only ontological question worth debating is whether such things are ultimate (in one or another sense). I argue that this is a mistake. Taking debates about ordinary objects as a case study, I show that the arguments that animate these debates bear directly on the question of which objects there are and cannot plausibly be recast as arguments about what’s ultimate. I also address the objection that, because they are trivially answerable, questions about what there is cannot be a proper subject of ontological debate.

Reception to follow.

Be the first to reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *