Philosophy Roulette Review

PR 453: Why You Should One-box in Newcomb's Problem

Article Data

https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMWYS

Authors

Howard J. Simmons

Abstract

I consider a familiar argument for two-boxing in Newcomb's Problem and find it defective because it involves a type of divergence from standard Baysian reasoning, which, though sometimes justified, conflicts with the stipulations of the Newcomb scenario. In an appendix, I also find fault with a different argument for two-boxing that has been presented by Graham Priest.

Video Review

Reviewer Reports

nogre0:

Rating: 11

ivan_neo:

Rating: 38

vipersgratitude:

Rating: 25

FrankBigTime:

Rating: 25

DCIBanks:

Rating: 25

SallyTheAltarBoy:

Rating: 50