PR 453: Why You Should One-box in Newcomb's Problem
Article Data
URL/PhilPapers Link:
https://philpapers.org/rec/SIMWYS
Authors
Howard J. Simmons
Abstract
I consider a familiar argument for two-boxing in Newcomb's Problem and find it defective because it involves a type of divergence from standard Baysian reasoning, which, though sometimes justified, conflicts with the stipulations of the Newcomb scenario. In an appendix, I also find fault with a different argument for two-boxing that has been presented by Graham Priest.
Video Review
Reviewer Reports
nogre0:
Rating: 11




ivan_neo:
Rating: 38



vipersgratitude:
Rating: 25


FrankBigTime:
Rating: 25


DCIBanks:
Rating: 25


SallyTheAltarBoy:
Rating: 50

