Philosophy Roulette Review

PR 485: Weighted sufficientarianisms: Carl Knight on the excessiveness objection

Article Data

https://philpapers.org/rec/TIMWSC

Authors

Dick Timmer

Abstract

Carl Knight argues that lexical sufficientarianism, which holds that sufficientarian concerns should have lexical priority over other distributive goals, is ‘excessive’ in many distinct ways and that sufficientarians should either defend weighted sufficientarianism or become prioritarians. In this article, I distinguish three types of weighted sufficientarianism and propose a weighted sufficientarian view that meets the excessiveness objection and is preferable to both Knight’s proposal and prioritarianism. More specifically, I defend a multi-threshold view which gives weighted priority to benefits directly above and below its thresholds, but gives benefits below the lowest threshold lexical priority over benefits above the highest threshold.

Video Review

Reviewer Reports

nogre0:

Rating: 12

Annfernal:

Rating: 25