PR 559: Approximate rationality and ideal rationality

Article Data

URL/PhilPapers Link:

https://philpapers.org/rec/ZHAARA-5

Authors

Snow Zhang

Abstract

According to approximate Bayesianism, Bayesian norms are ideal norms worthy of approximation for non-ideal agents. This paper discusses one potential challenge for approximate Bayesianism: in non-transparent learning situations—situations where the agent does not learn what they have or have not learnt—it is unclear that the Bayesian norms are worth satisfying, let alone approximating. I discuss two replies to this challenge and find neither satisfactory. I suggest that what transpires is a general tension between approximate Bayesianism and the possibility of “non-ideal” epistemic situations.

Video Review

Reviewer Reports

nogre0:

Rating: 95